May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
How Much Are Symptoms of Dryness in Daily Wear Hydrogel Contact Lens Wearers Alleviated by Silicone Hydrogel Lenses?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • R. L. Chalmers
    Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
  • B. Long
    CIBA Vision Corp., Duluth, Georgia
  • D. Keys
    Consultant, Athens, Georgia
  • S. Dillehay
    CIBA Vision Corp., Duluth, Georgia
  • C. Begley
    Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships R.L. Chalmers, CIBA Vision Corp., C; CIBA Vision Corp., R; B. Long, CIBA Vision Corp., E; D. Keys, CIBA Vision Corp., C; S. Dillehay, CIBA Vision Corp., E; C. Begley, CIBA Vision Corp., C.
  • Footnotes
    Support None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 5396. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      R. L. Chalmers, B. Long, D. Keys, S. Dillehay, C. Begley; How Much Are Symptoms of Dryness in Daily Wear Hydrogel Contact Lens Wearers Alleviated by Silicone Hydrogel Lenses?. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):5396.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: To determine the dryness symptoms that could be attributed to contact lens wear via comparison of symptoms from age-matched contact lens wearers and non-wearers. That difference in symptoms was then compared to the change in frequency of dryness symptoms in hydrogel lens wearers before and after they were refit with lotrafilcon A or B silicone hydrogel contact lenses.

Methods:: A historical, cross-sectional dataset of Dry Eye and Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaires (DEQ/CLDEQ) was used from an age matched subset of 259 contact lens wearers and 246 non-contact lens wearers. Prevalence of high frequency dryness ("frequent" or "constant") was compared between contact lens wearers and non-wearers. Longitudinal change in dryness frequency from 4 prospective studies (n=1,036) that involved refitting daily wear hydrogel lens wearers with silicone hydrogel lenses for daily or continuous wearing schedules was compared to the difference in symptoms between lens wearers and non-wearers.

Results:: In the historical dataset non-wearers were 47% less likely to report frequent to constant dryness than contact lens wearers (p=0.0001). In the prospective refitting trials to daily wear with lotrafilcon A lenses frequent or everyday dryness was reported by 67% (during the day - DD) and 62% (end of day (EOD) fewer subjects after refitting (p<0.0001, both). For lotrafilcon A used for up to 30 nights and days there was a 63% and 41% reduction in frequent or everyday DD and EOD dryness, respectively (p=0.014 and p=0.02, respectively). Lotrafilcon B with daily wear yielded a 48% and 46% reduction in DD and EOD dryness reports (p<0.0001, both).

Conclusions:: After refitting daily wear hydrogel lens wearers with silicone hydrogel lenses, they reported approximately half the frequency of during the day and end of day dryness; an amount similar to the frequency of dryness symptoms of non-wearers. A comparison to symptoms among patients who do not wear lenses helps to establish the proportion of symptoms that can be alleviated by a change in lens material.

Keywords: contact lens • cornea: tears/tear film/dry eye • cornea: epithelium 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×