May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
In-vivo and in-vitro ESI-TOF Lipidomic Analysis of Hydrogel Contact Lenses
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • K. K. Nichols
    Ohio State Univ, Columbus, Ohio
    College of Optometry,
  • C. Ziegler
    Ohio State Univ, Columbus, Ohio
    College of Optometry,
  • K. Oblad
    Ohio State Univ, Columbus, Ohio
    College of Optometry,
  • K. B. Green-Church
    Ohio State Univ, Columbus, Ohio
    Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Facility,
  • J. J. Nichols
    Ohio State Univ, Columbus, Ohio
    College of Optometry,
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships K.K. Nichols, None; C. Ziegler, None; K. Oblad, None; K.B. Green-Church, None; J.J. Nichols, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 5411. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      K. K. Nichols, C. Ziegler, K. Oblad, K. B. Green-Church, J. J. Nichols; In-vivo and in-vitro ESI-TOF Lipidomic Analysis of Hydrogel Contact Lenses. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):5411.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: It has been previously reported that lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel lenses exceeds conventional lenses. The impact of this lipid deposition may have significance in understanding alterations in tear stability and lens surface wettability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate lipids doped for an extended one-week period on traditional hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses (etafilcon A, lotrafilcon B, and senofilcon A) using mass spectrometry and to compare these results to in-vivo data with the same lens types.

Methods:: In phase I, an equal molar (5mmol each) fatty acid amide doping solution (oleamide, steramide, myristamide, palmitamide, and euracamide) was made using HPLC grade chloroform/ saline. The chloroform was subsequently evaporated off under nitrogen gas. Out-of-package contact lenses were soaked for one week while on a rotator. In phase II, eight normal, successful extended wear contact lens patients wore the three lens types for one week each. Lipids were extracted from the lenses and analyzed by Micromass LCT mass spectrometry equipped with an orthogonal electrospray source (Z-spray) operated in positive ion made. The doping solution was analyzed alone for comparison in phase I.

Results:: Analysis of the artificial doping solution and lenses showed the following [M+Na] values: myristamide at m/z of 250.1, palmitamide at m/z of 278.1, oleamide at m/z of 304.1, stearamide at m/z of 306.1, and euracamide at m/z of 360.1. Oleamide was the most abundant fatty acid amide present on all contact lenses (average relative peak intensity vs. doping solution 98.5%).The rank order of lipid deposition (greatest to least) was as follows: oleamide >> erucamide > myristamide > palmitamide > steramide. Total lipid assessment demonstrated the least amount of lipid deposited on etafilcon A (139843 average intensity peak count) < lotrafilcon B (2183863 average intensity peak count) < senofilcon A (241865 average intensity peak count). In-vivo data demonstrated primarily oleamide deposition, which is consistent with the distribution of fatty acid amides in the tear film.

Conclusions:: This data indicates that silicone hydrogel lenses are likely to deposit more fatty acid amides, primarily oleamide, than traditional hydrogel lenses in-vivo and in-vitro. The impact of this deposition on tear stability and lens wettability need further exploration.

Keywords: contact lens • lipids • cornea: tears/tear film/dry eye 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×