May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Using a Latent Variable Model to Characterize Bias and Imprecision of Optic Nerve Head Measurements
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • R. A. Bilonick
    UPMC Eye Center, Eye and Ear Institute, Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • G. Wollstein
    UPMC Eye Center, Eye and Ear Institute, Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • H. Ishikawa
    UPMC Eye Center, Eye and Ear Institute, Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • L. Kagemann
    UPMC Eye Center, Eye and Ear Institute, Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • M. L. Gabriele
    UPMC Eye Center, Eye and Ear Institute, Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • K. A. Townsend
    UPMC Eye Center, Eye and Ear Institute, Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • J. S. Schuman
    UPMC Eye Center, Eye and Ear Institute, Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships R.A. Bilonick, None; G. Wollstein, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., R; H. Ishikawa, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., R; L. Kagemann, None; M.L. Gabriele, None; K.A. Townsend, None; J.S. Schuman, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., P; Alcon; Allergan; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.; Merck; Optoview; Heidelberg Engineering, F; Alcon; Allergan; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.; Clarity; Merck; Heidelberg Engineering, R.
  • Footnotes
    Support NIH RO1-EY13178-06, P30-EY08098; The Eye and Ear Foundation (Pittsburgh, PA), and an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 5482. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      R. A. Bilonick, G. Wollstein, H. Ishikawa, L. Kagemann, M. L. Gabriele, K. A. Townsend, J. S. Schuman; Using a Latent Variable Model to Characterize Bias and Imprecision of Optic Nerve Head Measurements. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):5482.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To quantify the relative bias and imprecision of three devices used to measure the optic nerve head by employing latent variable modeling (LVM).

 
Methods:
 

The linear measurement error model for measurement xij is: xij = αi + ßi µj + εij where intercept αi and slope ßi characterize the relative bias for device i with the product of the ß's equals one, εij is the random error which is Normally distributed with mean zero and standard deviation σi, and µj is the true value for subject j. The variance of the µ's is σ2. Each of 85 subjects was measured for cup area by each of three devices: Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph (HRT, Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany), RTVue (high speed ultra high resolution optical coherence tomograph; Optivue, Fremont, CA) and Stratus Optical Coherence Tomograph (Stratus OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA). A latent variable model related the unobserved m to the measured x according to the above equation. Maximum likelihood estimates of the parameters were computed using the open source structural equation program Mx.

 
Results:
 

Parameter estimates and 95% confidence intervals for cup area are shown in the table and indicate that Stratus OCT almost certainly had a higher imprecision than both HRT and RTVue and the slopes for RTVue and Stratus OCT were higher than for HRT.The resulting calibration equations are:RTVue = -0.064 + .42 HRTHRT = 0.045 + 0.704 RTVueStratus = 0.8 + .249 HRTHRT = -0.095 + 0.8 StratusStratus = 0.75 + 0.88 RTVueRTVue = -0.99 + 0.37 Stratus  

 
Conclusions:
 

The bias and imprecision were well-characterized by LVM as indicated by the narrow confidence intervals. LVM should be used instead of naive regression which distorts the bias. Bland-Altman plots of the paired differences as a function of the paired averages assume equal imprecision and thus would be misleading for this data.

 
Clinical Trial:
 

www.clinicaltrials.gov NTC00343746

 
Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: biostatistics/epidemiology methodology 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×