May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Quantitative Analysis of Central Visual Field Defects Using 3D Threshold Amsler Grid Testing in Patients With Macular Edema
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • R. V. Jivrajka
    Ophthalmology, Doheny Eye Institute and Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
  • D. Younessi
    Ophthalmology, Doheny Eye Institute and Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
  • W. Fink
    NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech, Pasadena, California
  • A. A. Sadun
    Ophthalmology, Doheny Eye Institute and Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
  • J. Sebag
    VMR Institute, Huntington Beach, California
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships R.V. Jivrajka, None; D. Younessi, None; W. Fink, Caltech, P; A.A. Sadun, Caltech, P; J. Sebag, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 5522. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      R. V. Jivrajka, D. Younessi, W. Fink, A. A. Sadun, J. Sebag; Quantitative Analysis of Central Visual Field Defects Using 3D Threshold Amsler Grid Testing in Patients With Macular Edema. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):5522.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: To examine the influence of contrast sensitivity on central visual field defects in patients with macular edema using 3D Computer Automated Threshold Amsler Grid testing.

Methods:: Amsler grid abnormalities were measured in 17 eyes with focal macular edema and visual acuity > 20/80. Seated 12 inches from a touch screen computer monitor displaying an Amsler grid at a minimum contrast level (5% of standard Amsler grid), subjects outlined the visual field defect on the touch screen. This procedure was repeated 4 times with increasing levels of contrast, ultimately attaining 100% contrast levels comparable to a standard Amsler grid.

Results:: There were 3 eyes with no Amsler grid abnormalities at maximum contrast, but definite abnormalities at lower contrast levels. An inverse linear relationship existed between the amount of Amsler grid abnormality and the contrast level. At 100% contrast levels, the mean surface area of Amsler grid abnormality was 49.8 + 63 SA2 (arbitrary units). At 5% contrast levels, the mean surface area of abnormality was 214.6 + 164 SA2. The difference between the surface areas of Amsler grid abnormalities at the maximum and minimum contrast levels was found to be highly significant (p=0.000174, paired t-test).

Conclusions:: Amsler grid abnormalities in macular edema can be quanitified through the addition of contrast sensitivity measurement using a customized computer program. The inclusion of contrast sensitivity in Amsler grid testing improves the ability to detect central visual field abnormalities due to macular edema. The results showed a four-fold greater abnormality at minimum contrast levels, as compared to 100% contrast. This approach to quantitative analysis of central visual field abnormalities may enable earlier disease detection as well as provide a quantitative outcome measure of therapeutic intervention efficacy.

Keywords: contrast sensitivity • macula/fovea • visual fields 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×