May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Oxygen Permeability of Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Materials
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • P.B. Morgan
    Eurolens Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • N. Efron
    Eurolens Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • I.D. Cameron
    Eurolens Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • N.A. Brennan
    Brennan Consultants Pty, Melbourne, Australia
  • M. Goodwin
    Eurolens Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  P.B. Morgan, None; N. Efron, None; I.D. Cameron, None; N.A. Brennan, None; M. Goodwin, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 114. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      P.B. Morgan, N. Efron, I.D. Cameron, N.A. Brennan, M. Goodwin; Oxygen Permeability of Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Materials . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):114.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To measure the oxygen permeability (Dk) of currently–available silicone hydrogel contact lens materials.

Methods: : Permeability was measured in a randomized and masked manner for the following silicone hydrogel contact lens materials: Acuvue Advance, Acuvue Oasys, Focus Night & Day, O2 Optix and PureVision. Two conventional hydrogel lens materials, Etafilcon A and pHEMA, were measured as controls. We used an extended version of the polarographic measurement method described in ISO 9913–1. Stacks of 1–6 –1.00DS contact lenses were evaluated, with each stack measured twice. The resulting value for t/Dk (derived from electrode current and mathematically correcting for the edge effect) was plotted against t for each stack, with Dk calculated as the inverse of the gradient of this relationship; this latter method corrects for the boundary effect.

Results: : Measured permeability values (+/– 95% CI), and manufacturer–claimed values in parentheses, were: Acuvue Advance 59.2 +/– 5.7 (60), Acuvue Oasys 107.4 +/– 7.4 (103), Focus Night & Day 162.0 +/– 9.8 (140), O2 Optix 80.5 +/– 4.9 (110), PureVision 75.9 +/– 6.6 (99), Etafilcon 21.0 +/– 1.0 (21) and pHEMA 8.2 +/– 0.7 (7.5).

Conclusions: : With the exception of O2 Optix and PureVision, our values were broadly similar to manufacturer–claimed values. It is unclear whether some manufacturers have accounted for edge and/or boundary effects, and some manufacturers may have used a different measurement methodology (coulometric); these factors may account for discrepancies between our data and that of manufacturers. Our extended ISO methodology has generated data points with small 95% confidence intervals, suggesting that the use of the polarographic method of oxygen permeability measurement can be successfully employed with hyper–permeable contact lens materials.

Keywords: contact lens 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×