May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Computer Modeling of Pupil Dilation: Is Aqueous Humor Trapped in the Posterior Chamber?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • V.H. Barocas
    Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
  • E.C. Huang
    Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  V.H. Barocas, None; E.C. Huang, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grant EY015795
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 223. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      V.H. Barocas, E.C. Huang; Computer Modeling of Pupil Dilation: Is Aqueous Humor Trapped in the Posterior Chamber? . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):223.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the hypothesis that dark–room provocative testing for narrow angles leads to trapping of aqueous humor in the posterior chamber, which in turn pushes anteriorly on the iris and narrows the angle.

Methods: : A previous finite–element computer model was extended to include transient forces in the sphincter and/or dilator to dilate the pupil and simulate the response to room darkening. The resulting motion and contour change of the iris were modeled for different dilation rates and initial pupil diameters.

Results: : The pupil dilation model showed a slight trapping effect in which the posterior chamber volume decreased more slowly than in steady–state simulations. This corresponded to a large (25–50%) decrease in iris–lens contact, a slight (10%) rise in posterior–anterior pressure difference, and a slight (∼ 10 um) increase in iris curvature.

Conclusions: : The finite–element model predicts a relatively small trapping effect, which may contribute to angle narrowing during dark–room testing but is not sufficient to explain the entire phenomenon. Our results suggest that increased pressure in the posterior chamber should quickly cause anterior deflection of the iris (i.e., the decrease in contact area) and allow the aqueous humor to drain into the anterior chamber. If the pupil blocking force were stronger, the observed effects would be more pronounced.

Keywords: computational modeling • aqueous • iris 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×