May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Does a "Yellow" Tinted IOL Adversely Affect Scotopic and Photopic Visual Performance?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • F. Chiosi
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, NY
    Seconda Universita degli studi di Napoli, Naples, Italy
  • V.C. Greenstein
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, NY
    Ophthalmology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • R.E. Braunstein
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, NY
  • K. Holopigian
    Ophthalmology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • W. Seiple
    Ophthalmology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • J.R. Sparrow
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, NY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  F. Chiosi, None; V.C. Greenstein, None; R.E. Braunstein, None; K. Holopigian, None; W. Seiple, None; J.R. Sparrow, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grant EY02115, NIH Grant EY12951, RPB
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 304. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      F. Chiosi, V.C. Greenstein, R.E. Braunstein, K. Holopigian, W. Seiple, J.R. Sparrow; Does a "Yellow" Tinted IOL Adversely Affect Scotopic and Photopic Visual Performance? . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):304.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : The use of tinted intraocular lenses (IOLs), such as the AcrySof Natural "yellow" tinted lens (SN60AT) has led to questions regarding possible adverse effects on visual performance. This lens reduces transmission of short–wavelength light, and it has been suggested that vision will be impaired under scotopic conditions. We recently demonstrated that a trial lens had no effect on hue discrimination and no significant effect on dark–adapted sensitivity in healthy young individuals (1). Here we compare hue discrimination and dark–adapted sensitivity in patients who have had implantation of an AcrySof Natural "yellow" IOL in one eye and a UV light absorbing IOL (colorless) in the fellow eye.

Methods: : Nine subjects, ranging in age from 16–74 years with a "yellow" IOL in one eye and a UV IOL in the fellow eye, visual acuity of 20/40 or better, were tested monocularly following an NEI questionnaire (VFQ–25). A counter–balanced design was used. Hue discrimination was measured with the FM 100–hue test under standard illuminant C conditions. Following pupil dilation and 40 minutes of dark adaptation, rod–mediated thresholds to 440, 500, 650 nm and "white" light stimuli were then measured in each eye in 23 locations using a modified Humphrey perimeter.

Results: : There were no significant differences in FM 100–hue error scores or axes for eyes with the "yellow" tinted IOLs compared to those for eyes with the colorless UV IOLs. There were also no significant differences in dark–adapted sensitivities to 440, 500, 650 nm or white light stimuli.

Conclusions: : The "yellow" tinted lens does not adversely affect hue discrimination or dark–adapted sensitivities to 440, 500 and 650 nm and "white" light. These results for a group of patients together with previous data obtained on healthy young individuals (1) suggest that visual performance in scotopic conditions and color perception will not be impaired following implantation of a "yellow" tinted IOL. 1.Baker et al ARVO (2005)

Keywords: intraocular lens • color vision • visual fields 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×