May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
The Clinical Significance of Cyclotorsional Rotation Registration vs. Pupil Centroid Shift Compensation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J.P. Fang
    Ophthalmology, Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
  • L. Wang
    Ophthalmology, Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
  • D.D. Koch
    Ophthalmology, Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J.P. Fang, None; L. Wang, None; D.D. Koch, VISX, Alcon, C.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 532. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J.P. Fang, L. Wang, D.D. Koch; The Clinical Significance of Cyclotorsional Rotation Registration vs. Pupil Centroid Shift Compensation . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):532.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To investigate the residual wavefront aberrations induced by the cyclotorsional rotation and pupil centroid shift.

Methods: : In 64 eyes treated with the Iris Registration system of the VISX S4 laser, we found that the average cyclotorsional rotation was 2.1 ± 1.5 degrees (range 0 to 6.6 degrees) and the magnitude of pupil centroid shift was 0.27 ± 0.14 mm (range 0.04 to 0.51 mm). Based on corneal aberrations from 50 eyes of 50 subjects, we calculated the residual wavefront aberrations and Strehl ratio with cyclotorsional rotation of 2.1 degrees and horizontal decentration of 0.27 mm, respectively.

Results: : The total root–mean–square (RMS) (2nd to 6th order) and higher–order RMS (3rd to 6th order) were higher and the Strehl ratio was lower for decentration of 0.27 mm than for a cyclotorsional rotational error of 2.1 degrees (all P<0.001). However, the Strehl ratio with cyclotorsional rotation decreased significantly with increasing amounts of keratometric astigmatism (Pearson correlation coefficient –0.94, P<0.001); with astigmatism > 2 D, the Strehl ratio was comparable to that seen with decentration.

Conclusions: : For normal eyes with astigmatism less than 2 D, the pupil centroid shift feature provides greater visual benefit than does compensation for cyclotorsional rotation registration.

Keywords: refractive surgery: optical quality • refractive surgery: comparative studies 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×