May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Conjunctival Flaps in Silicone Hydrogel Lens Wearers
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S. Thota
    Optometry, University of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, TX
  • J. Perrigin
    Optometry, University of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, TX
  • W. Miller
    Optometry, University of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, TX
  • N. Leach
    Optometry, University of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, TX
  • J. Bergmanson
    Optometry, University of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, TX
  • A. Back
    CooperVision, Inc, Concord, CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S. Thota, None; J. Perrigin, None; W. Miller, None; N. Leach, None; J. Bergmanson, None; A. Back, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  CooperVision, Inc
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 82. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S. Thota, J. Perrigin, W. Miller, N. Leach, J. Bergmanson, A. Back; Conjunctival Flaps in Silicone Hydrogel Lens Wearers . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):82.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Silicone hydrogel contact lens wearers on a continuous wear schedule have recently reported on occasion to develop conjunctival flaps (CF), which are of unknown morphology. The purpose of this study is to describe the composition and cellular health of these features.

Methods: : Two adapted silicone hydrogel lens wearers exhibited bilateral CF after approximately 1 week of continuous wear. One subject (S1) wore lotrafilicon B lenses with an 8.6 mm base curve and the other subject (S2) wore lotrafilicon A lenses with an 8.4 mm base curve. One flap from each eye of the two subjects was sampled using impression cytology with cellulose acetate filters. The specimens were subsequently stained with hematoxylin and microscopically analyzed. The cytoplasm to nucleus ratio was assessed in 20 peripheral cells and 20 internal cells in each CF. Each subject completed a validated dry eye questionnaire (DEQ).

Results: : The location of the CF was found inferiorly in S1 and superiorly in S2 approximately 1 mm away from the limbus and peripheral to the lens edge. CF cytology showed multi–layered tightly packed sheets of polygonal epithelial cells. All flaps had a uniform cytological composition. In both subjects, all peripheral cells displayed a nucleus–cytoplasm ratio of 1:2. 65% of the internal cells in S1 were found to be 1:1 while 35% had a 2:1 ratio. For S2, 25% of the internal cells were found to be 1:1 and 75% were 2:1. Similar nuclear cell size and shape was noted in all cells within the CF, which also contained goblet cells. No inflammatory cells, basement membranes or stromal tissue were observed in any of the samples examined. S1 and S2 reported mild dry eye symptoms and scored normal and abnormal on the DEQ, respectively.

Conclusions: : CEF appear strictly comprised of healthy and vital epithelial cells as well as goblet cells. The likely etiology may be mechanical in nature due to the shape of the lens edge together combined with the higher modulus of the silicone hydrogel material. We propose that the edge of the lens is impinging and prematurely separating superficial from deeper conjunctival cells and, thus, forming a heap–like flap.

Keywords: contact lens • conjunctiva 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×