May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
A Comparison of Automated and Manifest Refraction: The Effect of Age
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • K. Durrani
    Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA
  • A. Khan
    Community Health Sciences, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
  • S. Ahmed
    Ophthalmology, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  K. Durrani, None; A. Khan, None; S. Ahmed, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 1179. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      K. Durrani, A. Khan, S. Ahmed; A Comparison of Automated and Manifest Refraction: The Effect of Age . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):1179.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Autorefraction without subjective refinement is being increasingly employed by opticians in Pakistan for prescribing glasses. The purpose of this study is to compare the refractive correction obtained by autorefraction alone and manifest refraction at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan and to determine the relationship of this difference with age.

Methods: : Two hundred and sixty nine patients visiting the ophthalmology clinic of a large tertiary–care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan were studied. Autorefraction alone using a Canon R–10 Autorefractor and manifest refraction were performed at the same visit. All children below age 15 underwent both evaluations under cycloplegia. A clinically significant difference between autorefraction and manifest refraction was defined as a difference of >0.50 D in sphere, cylinder, spherical equivalent or weighted axis, or >10° in axis. Results are reported for one eye (left) of each patient.

Results: : In 269 left eyes, the median difference between autorefraction and manifest refraction in spherical corrections was +0.10 D (p= 0.04), –0.37 D in cylindrical corrections (p<0.01), 7.2° in axes (p<0.01), and –0.09 D in spherical equivalent (p= 0.06). The median difference in weighted axes was 0.24 D (p<0.01). Children 10 years of age or younger were 3.47 times more likely to have a clinically significant difference in spherical corrections (OR: 3.47, 95% CI: 1.74– 6.96), 2.23 times in cylindrical corrections (OR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.09– 4.58), 1.72 times in axes (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.27– 4.90), 2.49 times in spherical equivalent (OR: 2.49, 95% CI: 0.88– 3.35) and 2.01 times more likely to have a clinically significant difference in weighted axes (OR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.22– 4.92).

Conclusions: : There is a significant difference between the corrections obtained by autorefraction alone and manifest refraction, particularly in children. Autorefraction alone without subjective refinement cannot be substituted for manifest refraction, especially in children 10 years of age or younger.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques • refraction 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×