May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Assessing Resident Skills in Phaco–Emulsification Surgery
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • B. Feldman
    Ophthalmology, George Washington University, Washington, DC
  • C. Geist
    Ophthalmology, George Washington University, Washington, DC
  • W. Silk
    Ophthalmology, George Washington University, Washington, DC
  • K. Kramer
    Ophthalmology, George Washington University, Washington, DC
  • D. Belyea
    Ophthalmology, George Washington University, Washington, DC
  • S. Grewal
    Ophthalmology, George Washington University, Washington, DC
  • A. Nemi
    Ophthalmology, George Washington University, Washington, DC
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  B. Feldman, None; C. Geist, None; W. Silk, None; K. Kramer, None; D. Belyea, None; S. Grewal, None; A. Nemi, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 650. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      B. Feldman, C. Geist, W. Silk, K. Kramer, D. Belyea, S. Grewal, A. Nemi; Assessing Resident Skills in Phaco–Emulsification Surgery . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):650.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To describe and evaluate a novel tool designed to assess resident competence in phaco–emulsification surgery. This study will establish the content validity and interrater reliability of the proposed assessment tool.

 
Methods:
 

40 attending ophthalmologists are assessing a single video of a resident phaco–emulsification surgery using our evaluation form. Additionally, these participants have been asked to comment on the ability of the tool to encompass the critical components of phaco–emulsification surgery.

 
Results:
 

The distribution of attending responses are being described in terms of range, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation in order to establish interrater reliability. The comments regarding the ability of the tool to appropriately address the critical aspects of phaco–emulsification surgery are being used to establish content validity.

 
Conclusions:
 

Our assessment tool is novel because it is the first to specifically address the critical aspects of phaco–emulsification surgery, the fundamental surgery of ophthalmology residency training. We expect our data to confirm the validity and reliability of this tool.  

 
Keywords: cataract • learning 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×