May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Agreement of Three Types of Instruments in Measuring Central Corneal Thickness and the Association With the Anterior Depth
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M. Fujioka
    Ophthalmology, Kobe, Kobe, Japan
  • Y. Tatsumi
    Ophthalmology, Kobe, Kobe, Japan
  • A. Kusuhara
    Ophthalmology, Kobe, Kobe, Japan
  • K. Taguchi
    Ophthalmology, Kobe, Kobe, Japan
  • H. Maeda
    Ophthalmology, Kobe, Kobe, Japan
  • M. Nakamura
    Ophthalmology, Kobe, Kobe, Japan
  • A. Negi
    Ophthalmology, Kobe, Kobe, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M. Fujioka, None; Y. Tatsumi, None; A. Kusuhara, None; K. Taguchi, None; H. Maeda, None; M. Nakamura, None; A. Negi, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 1349. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M. Fujioka, Y. Tatsumi, A. Kusuhara, K. Taguchi, H. Maeda, M. Nakamura, A. Negi; Agreement of Three Types of Instruments in Measuring Central Corneal Thickness and the Association With the Anterior Depth . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):1349.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : To evaluate the agreement of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements taken with noncontact specular microscopy (NSM), ultrasonic pachymetry (US) and Scheimpflug system and the association of anterior chamber depth (ACD) with the CCT inter–method differences.

Methods: : Right eyes of 136 persons without anti–glaucoma drugs (101 females,35 males),which included 32 patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG group) , 15 with ocular hypertension (OH group), 45 with primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG group), and 44 controls (normal group). Mean age was 61.3±17.9years. CCT was measured once with each method in a random order. ACD was simultaneously measured with the Scheimpflug system. CCT inter–method difference was assessed by the Bland–Altman method. The association of the ACD with the CCT inter–method differences was analyzed by linear regression.

Results: : The mean CCT taken with US, Scheimpflug, and NSM was 553.4±39.6µm, 565.7±37.6µm,552.5±43.3µm, respectively. There was no significant difference in CCT measurements of 4 groups (One–factor ANOVA: NSM,p=0.15 ;US, p=0.47; Scheimpflug, p=0.2). ACD of PACG group was significantly shallower compared with other 3 groups (Bonferroni/Dunn correction : p<0.01). The 95% limits of agreement were 4.61±42.99µm between US and NSM, –12.14±42.57µm between US and Scheimpflug, and –16.74±54.88µm between NSM and Scheimpflug. Significant correlations between the US to Scheimpflug CCT difference and ACD and between the NSM to Scheimpflug CCT difference and ACD were observed (Simple regression analysis: R2=0.031,p<0.01 and R2=0.019,p<0.01,respectively). Scheimpflug significantly overestimated the US and NSM CCT measurements in eyes with shallower anterior chamber.

Conclusions: : There were fair agreement in measuring CCT taken with the three instruments. However, the significant association of ACD with the CCT difference between the Scheimpflug and other two methods may reflect the distinct analytical methodology or algorithm of the Scheimpflug system.

Keywords: anterior chamber • cornea: clinical science • intraocular pressure 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.