May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Modeling The Mechanism Of Compensation Of Aberrations In Real Eyes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • P. Artal
    Laboratorio de Optica, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
  • J. Tabernero
    Laboratorio de Optica, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
  • A. Benito
    Laboratorio de Optica, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  P. Artal, None; J. Tabernero, None; A. Benito, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  MEC_FIS2004–2153 (Spain)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 1501. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      P. Artal, J. Tabernero, A. Benito; Modeling The Mechanism Of Compensation Of Aberrations In Real Eyes . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):1501.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : In most normal eyes, the aberrations of the crystalline lens partially compensate for the aberrations of the corneal, improving the overall retinal image quality. This compensation effect appears to be larger in hyperopic eyes (Artal et al., Journal of Vision, in the press). We study here the optical and geometrical sources that are responsible for this aberration compensation.

Methods: : We performed series of measurements in the eyes of three small groups of young subjects: 6 hyperopes (from +4 to +1 D), 8 emmetropes and 8 myopes (from –3 to –8 D). We measured the eye aberrations using a Hartmann–Shack wavefront sensor and the corneal aberrations by combining ray–tracing techniques with corneal topography. Angle kappa, lens tilt with respect to the line of sight and lens decentration with respect to the pupil centre was also measured by using our own developed instrument based in the recording of Purkinje images. Axial length and anterior chamber depth were measured using a clinical instrument (IOL–Master, Zeiss). From the complete set of experimental data, individual (customized) eye models were developed for each eye by using Zemax optical software. The predicted aberrations of the complete eye were compared with the measured aberrations.

Results: : Lens tilt was larger in average in the case of the hyperopic subjects (6.2º) than in the myopic group (4.5º). Lens decentration with respect to pupil center was small (maximum value 0.23 mm) in all eyes. The prediction of the aberrations by the individual models was in good agreement with the actual aberrations. For the particularly interesting case of coma, the correlation between prediction and measured data was high (R2>0.7) after fitting the measured spherical aberration value. The main factors driving the coma–compensation mechanism are related to the geometry (shape factor) of the lens in combination with the eye’s tilted optics (angle kappa). On the contrary, the impact of lens decentrations, lens surfaces asphericity or gradient–index distribution within the lens appeared to be negligible for the coma–compensation mechanism.

Conclusions: : We explored the underlying mechanisms that produce the compensation of aberrations in the eye by using optical and geometrical data together with a powerful modeling engine. We showed that angle kappa together with lens geometry (shape factor) mostly determine the compensation coma.

Keywords: crystalline lens • optical properties 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.