May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Prevention of Visual Field Defect Progression With Angiotensin–Converting Enzyme Inhibitor in Eyes With Normal–Tension Glaucoma
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • K. Hirooka
    Ophthalmology, Kagawa, Kita–gun, Japan
  • T. Baba
    Ophthalmology, Kagawa, Kita–gun, Japan
  • T. Fujimura
    Ophthalmology, Saiseikai Saijyo Hospital, Saijyo, Japan
  • F. Shiraga
    Ophthalmology, Kagawa, Kita–gun, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  K. Hirooka, None; T. Baba, None; T. Fujimura, None; F. Shiraga, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 1565. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      K. Hirooka, T. Baba, T. Fujimura, F. Shiraga; Prevention of Visual Field Defect Progression With Angiotensin–Converting Enzyme Inhibitor in Eyes With Normal–Tension Glaucoma . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):1565.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To investigate the effect of angiotensin–converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor on visual field changes in normal–tension glaucoma (NTG).

Methods: : We retrospectively reviewed a total of 38 patients with NTG. NTG patients with hypertension were divided into two groups, those receiving ACE inhibitor (n = 12) and those receiving other antihypertensive drug (n = 13). Control subjects (n = 13) had no previous history of hypertension. HfaFiles 5, an analytical program for the Humphrey Field Analyzer, with which we can perform a linear regression analysis of mean deviation (MD) of visual fields obtained during the follow–up period, was used to calculate the slope of the MD change per year.

Results: : In the ACE inhibitor–treated group, the mean MD change per year was 0.48±0.19 dB, while it was –0.38±0.23 dB in control subjects and –0.50±0.39 dB in the other antihypertensive drug–treated group (ACE inhibitor–treated group vs. control subjects, P =0.04; ACE inhibitor–treated group vs. other antihypertensive drug–treated group, P =0.02).

Conclusions: : ACE inhibitor seems to have a favorable effect on the visual field in patients with NTG. However, a randomized controlled study is needed to prove the effect of ACE inhibitors in eyes with NTG.

Keywords: neuroprotection • visual fields • pharmacology 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×