May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
The Value of the First PDT Results in Prediction of Visual Outcome
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M.R. Regenbogen
    Department of Opthalmology, Tel–aviv Medical Center, Tel–aviv, Israel
  • M. Goldstein
    Department of Opthalmology, Tel–aviv Medical Center, Tel–aviv, Israel
  • G. Heilweil
    Department of Opthalmology, Tel–aviv Medical Center, Tel–aviv, Israel
  • G. Treister
    Department of Opthalmology, Tel–aviv Medical Center, Tel–aviv, Israel
  • A. Loewenstein
    Department of Opthalmology, Tel–aviv Medical Center, Tel–aviv, Israel
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M.R. Regenbogen, None; M. Goldstein, None; G. Heilweil, None; G. Treister, None; A. Loewenstein, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 2116. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M.R. Regenbogen, M. Goldstein, G. Heilweil, G. Treister, A. Loewenstein; The Value of the First PDT Results in Prediction of Visual Outcome . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):2116.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : With the rise of many different treatment options for neovascular age related macular degeneration (AMD) including combined Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) and triamcinolone, and various anti–angiogenic drugs, we wanted to evaluate the prognostic value of the first PDT result and to asses the role of further PDT treatments if the first PDT fails to show stabilization or improvement.

Methods: : 80 charts of patients who underwent their first PDT from 3/2002 – 10/2004 due to all types of subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) secondary to AMD were reviewed. Patients who suffered from any other ocular disease, as well as patients treated with prior laser, or who had combined therapy of PDT and triamcinolone were excluded. Visual acuity (VA), lesion size and lesion type, at baseline, 3 months and 12 months, were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson Correlation Coefficients to find any correlation between success of the first treatment and stabilization in VA and reduced lesion size at 12 months. First treatment success was determined as improvement or stabilization in VA or in lesion size.

Results: : 46 patients were included in the analysis. There were 18 females and 27 males. No statistically significant correlation was found between first PDT success (when defined as change in lesion size) and stabilization or improvement in VA after 12 months (P=0.0562), or between stabilization or improvement of VA after the first PDT and reduction in lesion size after 12 months (p=0.1377). Variant analysis between subgroups of CNV was unable to detect any statistical significant correlation.

Conclusions: : No correlation was found between the results of the first PDT and the outcome determined by visual acuity or lesion size at 12 months. Therefore the decision upon continuing PDT should not be influenced by the results of the first PDT, and treatment indications should not differ from the ones suggested by the prior multi–center studies.

Keywords: age-related macular degeneration 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×