May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Ophthalmic Health Care in Australia and New Zealand and Contact Lens Related Microbial Keratitis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • L.J. Keay
    Optometry/Vision Science, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia
    Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
  • K. Edwards
    Optometry/Vision Science, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia
    Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
  • T. Naduvilath
    Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
  • F. Stapleton
    Optometry/Vision Science, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia
    Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  L.J. Keay, None; K. Edwards, None; T. Naduvilath, None; F. Stapleton, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Australian Government via the Cooperative Research Centres Program, Institute for Eye Research, CIBA Vision and NHMRC post graduate student scholarship
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 2398. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      L.J. Keay, K. Edwards, T. Naduvilath, F. Stapleton; Ophthalmic Health Care in Australia and New Zealand and Contact Lens Related Microbial Keratitis . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):2398.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To describe the referral pathways, treatment and outcome of contact lens (CL) related microbial keratitis (MK) in Australia and New Zealand.

Methods: : Cases in 15–64 year olds were identified via surveillance studies of Australia and New Zealand in 2003–2004 and were stratified into severe (central 4mm, >2mm or hypopyon/culture proven/vision loss, 123/297) and non–severe (174/297). Referral pathways, mode of treatment and 12–month rate of reduction of best–corrected visual acuity were characterised. Rate of resolution of symptoms within 1 week were compared for culture result (Gram–negative, acanthamoeba, fungal or nocardia keratitis [CP] vs remainder [Neg]) and effect of treatment delays (TD/nTD).

Results: : 19% presented to emergency departments, 33% general medical practitioner (GP), 45% optometrist and 2% other. There was a delay of >12 hrs before commencing appropriate therapy in 33% and this was associated with initial treatment by a GP (34/56 vs 10/117, p<0.001). Hospital clinics managed 67% of cases (175/260). Private clinics (33%, 85/260) predominantly used fluoroquinolone monotherapy (FQ) 80/105 (76%), whereas 70/174 (40%) of cases managed in hospital clinics were treated with fortified duotherapy (FD) and 96/174 (55%) FQ. Hospital clinics managed a higher proportion of severe disease (89/175 51% vs 16/85 19%, p<0.001) and 82/174 of cases (47%) were treated as in–patients. In hospitals, FD was more likely to be used in severe disease (54/87, 62% vs 16/83, 19%, p<0.001). For 160/268 (60%) of cases, symptoms had resolved in <7 days, which was influenced by both causative organism and treatment delays: CP/TD 13% vs CP/nTD 44% vs Neg/TD 55% vs Neg/nTD 72% (p<0.001). Vision loss was 14.2% annually in Australia (35/245).

Conclusions: : CL related MK is successfully managed with topical anti–microbial therapy in the majority of cases and only a small number result in reduced vision. Fluoroquinolone therapy is widespread especially in private clinics but more severe disease still tends to be treated with fortified duotherapy in hospital clinics. Timely diagnosis and commencement of appropriate therapy is important in reducing the disease duration.

Keywords: contact lens • keratitis • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: health care delivery/economics/manpower 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×