May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Timed Study of S–Crystallin Protein Expression in Light– and Dark–Adapted Octopus Photoreceptors
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • L.J. Robles
    Biology, California State University, Dominguez Hills, Carson, CA
  • T. Taylor
    Biology, California State University, Dominguez Hills, Carson, CA
  • S. Kelly
    Biology, California State University, Dominguez Hills, Carson, CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  L.J. Robles, None; T. Taylor, None; S. Kelly, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grant MBRS/GM08156
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 2835. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      L.J. Robles, T. Taylor, S. Kelly; Timed Study of S–Crystallin Protein Expression in Light– and Dark–Adapted Octopus Photoreceptors . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):2835.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Recent studies show that S–crystallin is present in greater amounts in dark–adapted octopus retinas and that it binds to F–actin, while in light–adapted retinas, S–crystallin is greatly reduced with no apparent F–actin binding (Zuniga et al., 2004). To further understand the kinetics of S–crystallin expression, we are investigating whether the expression of S–crystallin is time sensitive and varies with increasing time in the light or dark.

Methods: : Octopi were light or dark adapted 3–4 hours after which the eyecups of one octopus were dissected for controls. The remaining octopi were transferred to the opposing lighting condition and sacrificed at 15 minute intervals for a period of two hours. At each time point, the octopus was anesthetized on ice, the eyes dissected and the retinas homogenized in buffer. Protein concentrations in the homogenates were determined and equal amounts of protein from each interval were loaded onto SDS gels. The proteins were separated and translational differences in S–crystallin quantified. Translational differences in actin were also analyzed.

Results: : Preliminary results indicate initially increased levels of S–crystallin, from 5.36% to 10.4%, in the first 15 to 30 minutes in animals moved to the dark after which the levels decrease slightly and remain constant in the second hour. Translation levels of actin are constant. Levels of S–crystallin in animals moved to the light show cyclically increasing and decreasing levels while actin expression remains constant.

Conclusions: : Increases in S–crystallin levels during the first 30 minutes in the dark and cyclical levels in the light suggest that the possible involvement of S–crystallin in the reorganization of the rhabdomeric actin cytoskeleton may change over time.

Keywords: photoreceptors • transcription • protein structure/function 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×