May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Child Response to an Electronic Vision Occluder for Acuity Testing
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • H.P. Apple
    Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
    Apple Medical Incubator Inc, Winter Park, FL
  • J.M. Miller
    Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
    University of Arizona College of Optical Sciences, Tucson, AZ
  • E.M. Harvey
    Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
    University of Arizona College of Public Health, Tucson, AZ
  • D.C. Apple
    Apple Medical Incubator Inc, Winter Park, FL
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  H.P. Apple, Apple Medical Incubator Inc, E; J.M. Miller, None; E.M. Harvey, None; D.C. Apple, Apple Medical Incubator Inc, E.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Disney Award of Research to Prevent Blindness (JMM), NEI/NIH EY13153 (EMH)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 3161. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      H.P. Apple, J.M. Miller, E.M. Harvey, D.C. Apple; Child Response to an Electronic Vision Occluder for Acuity Testing . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):3161.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate a novel electronic shutter (AutOccluder) that permits rapid, complete monocular occlusion of vision in children for use in developing a visual acuity test that eliminates the order effect by interleaving presentations between eyes. This human factors study is aimed at determining if normal children will tolerate intermittent occlusion while watching a 60 second cartoon video.

Methods: : The AutOccluder is similar in appearance to a ViewMasterTM, and utilizes LCD shutters developed for welders’ hoods as well as an ultrasound system to monitor the child’s head position. A child peers through the AutOccluder, which is mounted at eye level on an adjustable floor stand. The shutters silently switch on/off in less than 0.1 second and have sufficient optical density to achieve occlusion. A laptop controls the shutters, monitors the child’s head position, and communicates wirelessly with a second laptop programmed to display visual acuity optotype stimuli and fixation stimuli (videos, etc). We evaluated the child’s response to viewing a 60 second cartoon segment while the shutters went through a preprogrammed cycle. Occlusion alternated between a test sequence of No Occlusion (NO), Right Eye Occlusion (REO), NO, Left Eye Occlusion (LEO), NO, and a sequence of NO, LEO, NO, REO, NO. Changes occurred every 10 seconds. Twenty–four second and third grade students who were participants in a vision screening program that included visual acuity testing and autorefraction participated in this study.

Results: : All children complied with the task. No change in ultrasound monitored head position was noted during testing, suggesting that no children demonstrated a startle response when monocular occlusion occurred.. When asked about the experience, most talked about movie content. Two children reported an awareness that the shutters were operating.

Conclusions: : This exploratory human factors work suggests that children will tolerate alternating monocular occlusion using this system. Future work will involve a handheld version and use of visual acuity tests.

Keywords: screening for ambylopia and strabismus • visual acuity • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×