May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Intraocular Camera for Retinal Prostheses
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • P. Nasiatka
    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
    Electrical Engineering/Electrophysics,
    Biomimetic MicroElectronics Systems Center (BMES), Los Angeles, CA
  • M. Hauer
    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
    Electrical Engineering/Electrophysics,
    Biomimetic MicroElectronics Systems Center (BMES), Los Angeles, CA
  • N. Stiles
    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
    Electrical Engineering/Electrophysics,
    Biomimetic MicroElectronics Systems Center (BMES), Los Angeles, CA
  • L. Lue
    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
    Electrical Engineering/Electrophysics,
    Biomimetic MicroElectronics Systems Center (BMES), Los Angeles, CA
  • S. Takahashi
    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
    Electrical Engineering/Electrophysics,
    Biomimetic MicroElectronics Systems Center (BMES), Los Angeles, CA
  • R. Agrawal
    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
    Ophthalmology, Doheny Retina Institute,
    Biomimetic MicroElectronics Systems Center (BMES), Los Angeles, CA
  • R. Freda
    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
    Ophthalmology, Doheny Retina Institute,
    Biomimetic MicroElectronics Systems Center (BMES), Los Angeles, CA
  • M. Humayun
    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
    Biomedical Engineering, Ophthalmology, Cell and Neurobiology, Doheny Retina Institute,
    Biomimetic MicroElectronics Systems Center (BMES), Los Angeles, CA
  • J. Weiland
    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
    Biomedical Engineering, Ophthalmology, Doheny Retina Institute,
    Biomimetic MicroElectronics Systems Center (BMES), Los Angeles, CA
  • A. Tanguay, Jr.
    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
    Electrical Engineering, Materials Science, Biomedical Engineering,
    Biomimetic MicroElectronics Systems Center (BMES), Los Angeles, CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  P. Nasiatka, None; M. Hauer, None; N. Stiles, None; L. Lue, None; S. Takahashi, None; R. Agrawal, None; R. Freda, None; M. Humayun, None; J. Weiland, None; A. Tanguay, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NSF BMES Engineering Research Center (EEC 0310723); NSF Biomedical Photonics (RAPD 0201927)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 3186. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      P. Nasiatka, M. Hauer, N. Stiles, L. Lue, S. Takahashi, R. Agrawal, R. Freda, M. Humayun, J. Weiland, A. Tanguay, Jr.; Intraocular Camera for Retinal Prostheses . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):3186.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To advance the design of a miniaturized video camera for use in conjunction with an epiretinal microelectrode array in support of a surgically–implantable retinal prosthesis.

Methods: : Previously, the optimal placement and device limitations of a surgically implantable intraocular camera were investigated. This new design utilizes the existing corneal lens and aqueous humor in conjunction with an aspherical lens to allow for improved field flattening at the detector plane, thus providing imaging characteristics that are matched to the degree of pixellation required by current and envisioned epiretinal microelectrode arrays. Additional visual psychophysics techniques were employed to reveal optimal pixellization and image pre– and post–processing requirements, yielding relaxed camera design constraints. The entire imaging device is designed to be surgically placed within the crystalline lens sac following a vitrectomy procedure similar to that commonly used for cataract surgery. This 3rd generation system exhibits reduced camera mass, advanced packaging technologies, reduced electrical/thermal power dissipation, and a feasible haptic design, all of which are critical elements for a human implantable intraocular camera.

Results: : A third–generation prototype intraocular camera (6 mm x 4 mm) was constructed and tested building upon previous work. This low mass prototype was sealed and will be surgically implanted in a canine eye for acute testing. Total camera mass, packaging, thermal, and haptic design issues are discussed.

Conclusions: : The replacement of an extraocular (head–mounted) camera with an advanced intraocular camera for retinal prostheses is feasible, providing natural image acquisition using eye movement.

Keywords: retina • optical properties 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×