May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
The Probability of Finding the Pathogen of Presumed Microbial Keratitis With Repeat Cultures After a Negative Culture at the F.I. Proctor Foundation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M.D. Bernal
    Ophthalmology, UCSF/Proctor Foundation, San Francisco, CA
  • V. Cevallos
    Proctor Foundation, San Francisco, CA
  • J.P. Whitcher
    Ophthalmology, UCSF/Proctor Foundation, San Francisco, CA
  • T. Lietman
    Ophthalmology, UCSF/Proctor Foundation, San Francisco, CA
  • K. Chern
    Ophthalmology, UCSF/Proctor Foundation, San Francisco, CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M.D. Bernal, None; V. Cevallos, None; J.P. Whitcher, None; T. Lietman, None; K. Chern, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 3561. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M.D. Bernal, V. Cevallos, J.P. Whitcher, T. Lietman, K. Chern; The Probability of Finding the Pathogen of Presumed Microbial Keratitis With Repeat Cultures After a Negative Culture at the F.I. Proctor Foundation . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):3561.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : When faced with a negative culture for presumed microbial keratitis, repeat cultures are often obtained. In this report, we determine whether a second culture after an initial negative result increases diagnostic yield

Methods: : Retrospective cohort study. The results of corneal cultures for presumed microbial keratitis seen at F.I. Proctor Foundation since 1996 with an initial negative culture result will be reviewed. The percentage of positive repeat corneal cultures was determined.

Results: : Corneal cultures were taken from 699 patients with presumed microbial keratitis from January 1996 until October 2005 at the F.I. Proctor Foundation. 31 of these 699 patients had an initial negative corneal culture and one or more subsequent corneal cultures within 60 days of the first culture. Nine of the 31 (29%) patients had a positive second corneal culture (1 fungal, 2 parasites, 6 bacteria). Fifty–five percent (5/9) of the repeat positive cultures were taken 26 or more days after the initial negative culture and all of these grew bacteria. The other repeat positive cultures (45%, 4/9) were taken one to ten days after the initial culture. Of these four, two grew parasites, one fungi and one bacteria. Early repeated cultures were far more likely to yield non–bacterial organisms (p=0.048, Fisher’s Exact).

Conclusions: : No previous reports to our knowledge have studied the utility of repeating corneal cultures for presumed microbial keratitis. The yield of repeated corneal cultures at our institution appears relatively low. However, repeated cultures that were drawn early and were positive were more likely to grow fungi or parasites while those that were drawn late were more likely to grow bacteria; in both of these situations the results of these positive cultures are likely to alter therapy. Larger studies will be needed to clarify the cost–effectiveness of repeating corneal cultures for presumed microbial keratitis.

Keywords: keratitis • clinical laboratory testing • microbial pathogenesis: clinical studies 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×