May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Study of Visible and Ultraviolet Light Elicited Pupillary Light Reflex (PLR) in Mice
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M.F. Bellassai
    University of Missouri, Columbia, MO
    Biological Engineering,
  • K. Zhang
    University of Missouri, Columbia, MO
    Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery,
  • B. Chang
    The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME
  • G. Yao
    University of Missouri, Columbia, MO
    Biological Engineering,
  • B. Lei
    University of Missouri, Columbia, MO
    Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery,
    Department of Ophthalmology, Mason Eye Institute,
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M.F. Bellassai, None; K. Zhang, None; B. Chang, None; G. Yao, None; B. Lei, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc. and The University of Missouri Research Board
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 3709. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M.F. Bellassai, K. Zhang, B. Chang, G. Yao, B. Lei; Study of Visible and Ultraviolet Light Elicited Pupillary Light Reflex (PLR) in Mice . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):3709.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Pupillary light reflex (PLR) has previously been used as a functional test in animal models of retinal degeneration. We investigate the feasibility of using PLR to quantitatively examine the functionalities of rod and cone systems in mouse.

Methods: : PLR was measured in dark–adapted C57BL mice, rho–/– rhodopsin knockout mice and cpfl1/cpfl1 cone function loss mice. The mice are at 6–7 weeks of age. Both visible (505nm) and ultraviolet (380nm) light were used in the study with intensities ranging from 7 to 16 log units of photons/s/cm2. Mice were exposed to successive 5–second stimuli of ascending intensities of light. The pupil was imaged by an infrared CCD video camera and videos were digitized at a sample frequency of 10Hz. The pupil area of each image was measured automatically using a custom compiled program. We obtained the response–intensity curve of PLR and compared them with electroretinogram (ERG) data.

Results: : In C57BL mice, the PLR thresholds were ∼108 photons/s/cm2 for both UV (380nm) and visible (505nm) wavelengths. The initiation of cone response can be clearly identified at ∼1012.5 photons/s/cm2. Similar cone threshold was observed from PLRs measured in rho–/– mice. In cpfl1/cpfl1 mice, PLR measurements showed the same threshold as in C57BL mice; whereas the PLR became saturated at intensities larger than 1012.5 photons/s/cm2 and cone system contribution was absent. When comparing PLR response–intensity curves with the corresponding ERG curves, we found that dark–adapted ERG responses had higher thresholds than PLR.

Conclusions: : Our results indicate that PLR provides significant quantitative data that can be used for testing the functionality of visual systems. Cone system and rod system responses have different thresholds and thus can be assessed independently.

Keywords: pupillary reflex • electroretinography: non-clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×