May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Anaphylaxis Following Intravenous Fluorescein in a Vitreoretinal Clinic: Report of 4 Cases
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S. Rao
    Ophthalmology, Duke, Durham, NC
  • J. Gross
    Ophthalmology, Duke, Durham, NC
  • S. Fekrat
    Ophthalmology, Duke, Durham, NC
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S. Rao, None; J. Gross, None; S. Fekrat, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 4048. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S. Rao, J. Gross, S. Fekrat; Anaphylaxis Following Intravenous Fluorescein in a Vitreoretinal Clinic: Report of 4 Cases . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):4048.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : To report the incidence of anaphylaxis to intravenous fluorescein in a consecutive series of vitreoretinal patients and to review the published literature on adverse reactions.

Methods: : Between 1998–2005, 1400 consecutive vitreoretinal patients undergoing fluorescein angiography at one satellite office were retrospectively reviewed. Medline search between 1950–2005 identified relevant published literature that was reviewed.

Results: : Four of 1400 (0.3%) patients developed anaphylaxis after receiving intravenous fluorescein. The reaction was promptly recognized and treated with injectable epinephrine (Epipen) by the eyeMD in the vitreoretinal clinic. All symptoms promptly resolved. The ambulance was called in all 4 cases. In one case, the 911 first responders arrived 20 minutes later and were only Basic Emergency Medical Technicians who were not able to carry or inject epinephrine at that time in North Carolina. No one died. Over the last 55 years, 14 cases (0.2%) of anaphylaxis and 7 deaths have been published. The unreported incidence of anaphylaxis is likely higher.

Conclusions: : Anaphylaxis to fluorescein dye is uncommon, but unavoidable and does occur. A medical doctor must be on the premises whenever a fluorescein angiogram is performed to recognize and promptly treat anaphylaxis in affected individuals to prevent death.

Keywords: imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • retina 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.