May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Factors for Excellent Visual Recovery After Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection for Central Retinal Vein Patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • K. Koizumi
    Ophthalmology, Kyoto City Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
    Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
  • T. Suzuki
    Ophthalmology, Kyoto City Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
  • T. Yamada
    Ophthalmology, Kyoto City Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
  • C. Shimomura
    Ophthalmology, Kyoto City Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  K. Koizumi, None; T. Suzuki, None; T. Yamada, None; C. Shimomura, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 4262. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      K. Koizumi, T. Suzuki, T. Yamada, C. Shimomura; Factors for Excellent Visual Recovery After Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection for Central Retinal Vein Patients . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):4262.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To clarify a good indication of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injection for central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) patients.

Methods: : Since April 2004, we evaluated background features, including age, gender, preoperative visual acuity, type of CRVO (hemorrhagic or venous stasis) and duration between visual deterioration and IVTA intervention, of nine consecutive CRVO cases who underwent 4mg of IVTA injection.

Results: : Three of nine cases recovered their best corrected vision to 20/20. Two of these three cases required 3 injections to maintain their vision. These three cases are significantly younger than those who recovered their vision less than 20/20 (55±10 vs. 66±7 (y. o. ), P<0.05) and they were treated by IVTA injection significantly earlier after visual deterioration than the others (2±2 vs. 10±5 (month), P<0.05). Gender, preoperative visual acuity and type of CRVO did not influence excellent visual recovery.

Conclusions: : IVTA injection for central retinal vein occlusion is more effective, when applied to younger–age patients, and performed at earlier intervention.

Keywords: vascular occlusion/vascular occlusive disease • retina • corticosteroids 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×