May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Differences in the LAT Coding Region Are Responsible gor Differential Latent Infection With Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) Type 1 and Type 2
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • T.P. Margolis
    UCSF, San Francisco, CA
    F.I. Proctor Foundation and Dept. of Ophthalmology,
  • Y. Imai
    UCSF, San Francisco, CA
    F.I. Proctor Foundation,
  • K. Apakupakul
    UCSF, San Francisco, CA
    F.I. Proctor Foundation,
  • P.R. Krause
    Cber, FDA, Bethesda, MD
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  T.P. Margolis, None; Y. Imai, None; K. Apakupakul, None; P.R. Krause, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grants EY10008 and EY02162. RPB Senior Scientific Investigator Award
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 4302. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      T.P. Margolis, Y. Imai, K. Apakupakul, P.R. Krause; Differences in the LAT Coding Region Are Responsible gor Differential Latent Infection With Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) Type 1 and Type 2 . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):4302.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Not all ganglionic neurons are equally permissive for latent infection with HSV. Ganglionic neurons identified by Mab A5 are the principle site of latent infection with HSV–1 whereas ganglionic neurons identified by Mab KH10 are the principle site of latent infection with HSV–2. We previously demonstrated that a chimeric HSV–2 that expresses the HSV–1 LAT establishes latency primarily in A5–positive neurons, similar to HSV–1. In the current study we investigated whether a chimeric HSV–1 that expresses the HSV–2 LAT (HSV–1 17+/LAT2) establishes latency primarily in KH10–positive neurons, similar to HSV–2.

Methods: : Swiss Webster mice were infected by corneal inoculation with either HSV–1 (17+), HSV–1 17+/LAT2, HSV–1 17+/LAT2 rescuant, HSV–2 (MS) or dlsptk, a TK deletion virus. At 21 days post–infection mice were euthanized followed by perfusion with paraformaldehyde. Trigeminal ganglia were then removed, sectioned and assayed by combined in situ hybridization and immunofluorescent staining.

Results: : Following ocular inoculation with HSV–1 (17+)/LAT2 45% of the latently infected neurons were KH10+ while only 7% expressed the A5 marker. This distribution was very similar to that observed following inoculation with HSV–2 and significantly different from that observed with HSV–1. In contrast, latent infection with the HSV–1 (17+)/LAT2 rescuant was almost never observed in the KH10+ neuronal population, a pattern similar to that with HSV–1. These results cannot be explained by differential LAT promoter activity in A5+ and KH10+ neurons since following inoculation with dlsptk (an HSV–1 virus incapable of productive infection in neurons), 9% of the latently infected neurons were A5+ and 8% were KH10+, a distribution similar to the representation of these neuronal populations in the trigeminal ganglion.

Conclusions: : A chimeric HSV–1 mutant that expresses the HSV–2 LAT establishes latency primarily in KH10–positive neurons, similar to HSV–2. These data imply that a viral function associated with a small portion of the LAT coding region plays a key role in determining the cell tropism of HSV latency.

Keywords: herpes simplex virus • in situ hybridization • innervation: sensation 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×