May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
True Intraocular Pressure and Young's Modulus of the Cornea May Vary With Corneal Thickness in vivo
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D.C. Pye
    Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  • K.E. Hamilton
    Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  D.C. Pye, None; K.E. Hamilton, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 4450. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D.C. Pye, K.E. Hamilton; True Intraocular Pressure and Young's Modulus of the Cornea May Vary With Corneal Thickness in vivo . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):4450.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Variations in corneal thickness are believed to cause an error in intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement by the Goldmann tonometer. The aim of this study was to determine whether the calculated true IOP and Young’s modulus of the cornea varies with corneal thickness in young adult humans in vivo.

Methods: : Central corneal curvature (Reichert EyeChek autokeratometer), central corneal thickness (BVI ultrasonic pachymeter) and applanation IOP (Goldmann tonometer) were measured in 99 right eyes of normal healthy human subjects (21.1±2.9 y) in vivo. The algorithms of Doughty and Zaman, Ehlers et al., Orssengo and Pye, Whitacre et al. and the Dresden correction table were used to correct the applanation IOP for the effects of corneal thickness. Young’s modulus of the cornea was calculated using the Orssengo–Pye algorithm.

Results: : The mean central corneal curvature of the subjects was 7.8 mm (95% CI 7.2–8.3 mm), central corneal thickness was 547.3 µm (95% CI 480.5–614.0 µm) and applanation IOP was 15.2 mmHg (95% CI 9.8–20.6 mmHg). There was no statistically significant Pearson correlation between the corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation IOP (R=0.007, p=0.945). Linear regression revealed a statistically significant negative relationship between corneal thickness and the corrected IOP for all algorithms: Doughty and Zaman (–0.62 mmHg/10 µm), Ehlers et al. (–0.62 mmHg/10 µm), Orssengo–Pye (–0.38 mmHg/10 µm), Whitacre et al. (–0.20 mmHg/10 µm) and the Dresden correction table (–0.41 mmHg/10 µm). All slopes were statistically significant (p<0.05). Young’s modulus of the cornea decreased with increasing corneal thickness at a rate of 7.51 kPa/10 µm (R=0.426, p<0.001, linear regression).

Conclusions: : The results suggest that, in healthy young humans in vivo, the true IOP and Young’s modulus of the cornea may decrease as corneal thickness increases.

Keywords: intraocular pressure • cornea: clinical science 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×