May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Eccentric Macular Holes Following Vitrectomy With Peeling Of Epimacular Proliferation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J.O. Mason, III
    Ophthalmology, Retina, Birmingham, AL
    Ophthalmology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
  • R.M. Feist
    Ophthalmology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
    Ophthalmology, Retina Consultants of Alabama, Birmingham, AL
  • M.A. Albert, Jr.
    Ophthalmology, Retina Consultants of Alabama, Birmingham, AL
  • R.S. Vail
    Ophthalmology, Retina Consultants of Alabama, Birmingham, AL
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J.O. Mason, None; R.M. Feist, None; M.A. Albert, None; R.S. Vail, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 4675. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J.O. Mason, III, R.M. Feist, M.A. Albert, Jr., R.S. Vail; Eccentric Macular Holes Following Vitrectomy With Peeling Of Epimacular Proliferation . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):4675.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To describe 6 patients (6 eyes) who developed an eccentric macular hole after surgery for idiopathic epimacular proliferation.

 
Methods:
 

Retrospective review of 631 consecutive patients who underwent vitrectomy with peeling of the epimacular proliferation and in most cases the internal limiting membrane (ILM) from May 2001 to May 2005. Six patients were found to have developed an eccentric macular hole postoperatively.

 
Results:
 

Eccentric macular holes developed 9 days to 8 months (mean, 3.1 months) after epimacular proliferation peeling. The ILM was peeled in addition to the epimacular proliferation in 5 of the 6 cases. 4 of the 6 eccentric macular holes were located temporal to the fovea; one was located superior to the fovea; and one was located nasal to the fovea. Final visual acuities after a mean follow–up period of 17.3 months were 20/20 in 2 eyes, 20/25 in 1 eye, 20/40 in 2 eyes, and 5/200 in 1 eye. The eye with the eccentric macular hole nasal to the fovea had the poorest final visual acuity of 5/200.

 
Conclusions:
 

Eccentric macular holes occurring after vitrectomy surgery to remove epimacular proliferation is an uncommon postoperative finding. To our knowledge this is the largest case series of such patients reported. Various explanations have been suggested to explain the etiology of these holes, but there remains no consensus.  

 
Keywords: macular holes • retina • macula/fovea 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×