May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
T–Lymphocyte Subpopulations (CD4 and CD8) Presence in Pterygia: Evaluation of the Inflammatory Response With Regards to Clinical Severity and Topical Anti–inflammatory Therapy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J.J. DeStafeno
    Duke University Eye Center, Durham, NC
    Ophthalmology,
  • D.M. Blackmon
    Duke University Eye Center, Durham, NC
    Ophthalmology,
  • T.J. Cummings
    Duke University Eye Center, Durham, NC
    Pathology,
  • S.S. Stinnett
    Duke University Eye Center, Durham, NC
    Biostatistics,
  • T. Kim
    Duke University Eye Center, Durham, NC
    Ophthalmology,
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J.J. DeStafeno, None; D.M. Blackmon, None; T.J. Cummings, None; S.S. Stinnett, None; T. Kim, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 4980. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J.J. DeStafeno, D.M. Blackmon, T.J. Cummings, S.S. Stinnett, T. Kim; T–Lymphocyte Subpopulations (CD4 and CD8) Presence in Pterygia: Evaluation of the Inflammatory Response With Regards to Clinical Severity and Topical Anti–inflammatory Therapy . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):4980.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To determine the presence of T–lymphocyte subpopulations(CD4 and CD8) with respect to the clinical severity in pterygiaand examine the effect of topical anti–inflammatorieson the presence of T–lymphocytes.

 
Methods:
 

Retrospective, observational case series. Pterygiumspecimens from 19 eyes of 19 patients and normal conjunctivafrom 1 eye of 1 control patient were histopathologically andimmunohistochemically studied for T–lymphoctye subpopulationsby a masked, certified examiner. Main outcome measures includedevidence of T–lymphocyte presence and the effect of priortopical anti–inflammatories and clinical severity on theextent of T–lymphocytes presence in pterygia.

 
Results:
 

16 (84%) of eyes with pterygia displayed marked presenceof T–lymphocytes (CD4 or CD8) compared to absent to tracepresence in the control eye. There was no significant differencein amount of T–lymphoctye subpopulations based on clinicalseverity of pterygia (p=0.56). A history of topical anti–inflammatoryuse did not affect the presence or amount of T–lymphocytes.

 
Conclusions:
 

T–lymphocytic presence in pterygia supportsthe premise that cellular immunity and immunopathologic mechanismsplay a role in the pathogenesis of pterygia. The effect of theclinically observed severity and the role of local immunosuppressionon inflammation, prevention, and progression of pterygia needto be further evaluated.  

 

 
Keywords: Pterygium • conjunctiva 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×