May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Development of Temporal Response Properties of Neurons in the Primary Visual Cortex (v1) and Visual Area 2 (v2) of Macaque Monkeys
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • C. Nakatsuka
    Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX
  • B. Zhang
    Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX
  • H. Bi
    Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX
  • I. Watanabe
    Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX
  • J. Zheng
    Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX
  • Y. Lin
    Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX
  • E.L. Smith, III
    Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX
  • Y.M. Chino
    Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  C. Nakatsuka, None; B. Zhang, None; H. Bi, None; I. Watanabe, None; J. Zheng, None; Y. Lin, None; E.L. Smith, None; Y.M. Chino, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  EY08128, EY03611, RR07146
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 5366. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      C. Nakatsuka, B. Zhang, H. Bi, I. Watanabe, J. Zheng, Y. Lin, E.L. Smith, III, Y.M. Chino; Development of Temporal Response Properties of Neurons in the Primary Visual Cortex (v1) and Visual Area 2 (v2) of Macaque Monkeys . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):5366.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : New born and young human infants have poor sensitivity to temporally modulating stimuli (e.g., Rasengane et al, 1997; Swanson and Birch, 1991; Dopkins et al, 1999; but see Regal 1981). The cortical mechanisms that may limit infant's visual performance in temporal domain have not been systematically explored. In this study, therefore, we investigated the relative maturation of temporal frequency tuning characteristics and parallel changes in visual latency of V1 and V2 neurons.

Methods: : At 2–, 4– and 8–weeks of age, microelectrode recording experiments were conducted in both V1 and V2. Drifting sine wave gratings (contrast = 40–80%) were used as stimuli. After optimizing stimulus orientation, size, and spatial frequency for each unit, we measured neuron's responsiveness as a function of stimulus temporal frequencies. Response latency was measured by determining the time between stimulus onset and the time at which unit's response significantly exceeded the noise level over 3 consecutive bins.

Results: : Optimal temporal frequencies and temporal resolutions of both V1 and V2 units in infant monkeys, except for V1 of 8–week–old infants, were significantly lower than those in adults. Response latencies of both V1 and V2 neurons in infant monkeys, except for V1 of 8–week–old infants, were significantly longer than those in adults. Unlike in adults, however, the response latencies of individual neurons in infant monkeys were not correlated with their temporal resolutions. In infant monkeys, both V1 and V2 neurons exhibited stronger response adaptation during the sustained responses compared to that in adults.

Conclusions: : The present results are consistent with the psychophysical observations that temporal contrast sensitivity of human infants is immature as late as 8 months of age (roughly equivalent to 8 weeks of age in monkeys). Also the present findings add new evidence for the hypothesis that the functional maturation of the primate visual brain proceeds in a hierarchical manner (Movshon and Kiorpes, 2003; Zhang et al, 2005).

Keywords: visual cortex • development • receptive fields 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×