May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Retinal Function Assessment Following Intravitreal Injection of Erythropoietin in Rats: A Dose–Toxicity Study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D. Hwang
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, NY
  • S. Tari
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, NY
  • L. Wu
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, NY
  • S. Chang
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, NY
  • M. Forbes
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, NY
  • J.C. Tsai
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, NY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  D. Hwang, None; S. Tari, None; L. Wu, None; S. Chang, None; M. Forbes, None; J.C. Tsai, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Eye Surgery Fund (JCT), Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., Eye Bank for Sight Restoration.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 5724. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D. Hwang, S. Tari, L. Wu, S. Chang, M. Forbes, J.C. Tsai; Retinal Function Assessment Following Intravitreal Injection of Erythropoietin in Rats: A Dose–Toxicity Study . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):5724.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

Erythropoietin (EPO) has been shown to have neuroprotectiveeffects in several animal models. This pilot study assessedthe safety of a single intravitreal injection of varying dosesof EPO on retinal function in rats.

 
Methods:
 

Twenty–four Sprague–Dawley rats were randomlydivided into one of 7 groups: control, sham injection, vehicleinjection, and EPO injections of 50ng, 100ng, 250ng, and 625ng (N=3–4 per group). Only the right eyes were treatedin each animal. Scotopic and photopic full–field ERGswere taken from both eyes simultaneously one day prior to theintravitreal injections (baseline), then 3, 7, 14, and 21 daysafter the injections. After dark adaptation, scotopic maximalresponse ERGs were obtained using (3 cd–s/m2) on a darkbackground. Photopic ERGs were recorded using the (3 cd–s/m2)on a white background (30 cd/m2). The amplitude and latencyof each component were analyzed. The contralateral eye was usedto correct for inter–experimental variability. Group designationswere unmasked after all ERGs were performed. Statistical analysiswas carried out using Two–way ANOVA.

 
Results:
 

In all groups and at all time points, scotopic and photopicresponses showed no statistically significant difference inboth amplitude and latency compared to baseline and controlvalues (except for photopic b–wave amplitude of vehicleinjection, day 14). The scotopic a–and b–wave readingsare shown below.  

 

 
Conclusions:
 

A single intravitreal injection of EPO (at dosesup to 625 ng) does not appear to affect retinal function inrats as assessed by ERG response. These results warrant furtherinvestigation to assess fully the ocular safety of this potentialneuroprotective agent.

 
Keywords: drug toxicity/drug effects • electroretinography: non-clinical • neuroprotection 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×