May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
C–Kit and SSEA–1 Define Temporally and Spatially Distinct Retinal Progenitor Subsets
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • H. Tabe
    Molecular and Developmental Biology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
  • H. Koso
    Molecular and Developmental Biology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
  • S. Satoh
    Molecular and Developmental Biology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
  • S. Watanabe
    Molecular and Developmental Biology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  H. Tabe, None; H. Koso, None; S. Satoh, None; S. Watanabe, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 5759. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      H. Tabe, H. Koso, S. Satoh, S. Watanabe; C–Kit and SSEA–1 Define Temporally and Spatially Distinct Retinal Progenitor Subsets . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):5759.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Neural retina is an important target organ for regenerative medicine. Therefore, isolation and expansion of retinal progenitor cells are critical issues from both scientific and clinical views. However, the characters of the immature retinal cells are not elucidated because of the lack of prospective approach to identify retinal progenitor cells. We aimed to identify cell surface markers of retinal progenitor cells.

Methods: : We screened the expression pattern of cell surface proteins in mouse immature retina by using flow cytometer and various antibodies against membrane proteins. Among them, 25 antibodies recognized sub–populations of immature retina, and we examined the proliferation and differentiation abilities of purified those sub–populations of retina by various in vitro assay systems.

Results: : Results obtained with SSEA–1 and c–kit positive populations showed that these molecules marked temporally and spatially distinct retinal progenitor subsets. SSEA–1 positive cells are in the peripheral region of retina of the E17 embryo and then dramatically disappeared along with retinal development. SSEA–1 strong positive cells were Ki–67 antigen positive and had prolonged proliferation activities than SSEA–1 negative cells. Moreover, differentiation of SSEA–1 cells into late born retinal subtypes took longer period, suggesting that these cells are at more immature stage than SSEA–1 negative cells. Differential expression of Wnt signal–related genes between SSEA–1 positive and negative subpopulations of retinal cells was revealed, and involvement of Wnt signaling pathway for maintenance of SSEA–1 positive cells was suggested. This observation was in accordance with our in vitro results suggesting the role of Wnt as prevention of premature differentiation of retina. c–kit also labeled a subset of progenitor cells, and c–kit/SSEA–1 double positive cells had more immature characters than single positive cells.

Conclusions: : We showed cell surface molecules, c–kit and SSEA–1, as useful tools not only to mark temporally and spatially distinct retinal subpopulations, but also to study the regulation of differentiation of neural retina.

Keywords: retinal development • flow cytometry • signal transduction 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×