May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Relationship of Psychological Factors to Success in Vision Rehabilitation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • P. Grant–Jordan
    Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
    Jesse Brown VAMC, Chicago, IL
  • M. Dunlap
    Jesse Brown VAMC, Chicago, IL
  • M.L. Gvazda–Schwartz
    Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
  • T. Stelmack
    Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
    Jesse Brown VAMC, Chicago, IL
  • W. Seiple
    Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
    Department of Ophthalmology, New York University, New York, NY
  • J.P. Szlyk
    Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
    Jesse Brown VAMC, Chicago, IL
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  P. Grant–Jordan, None; M. Dunlap, None; M.L. Gvazda–Schwartz, None; T. Stelmack, None; W. Seiple, None; J.P. Szlyk, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Department of Veterans Affairs, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, Washington, DC; Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 5840. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      P. Grant–Jordan, M. Dunlap, M.L. Gvazda–Schwartz, T. Stelmack, W. Seiple, J.P. Szlyk; Relationship of Psychological Factors to Success in Vision Rehabilitation . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):5840.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To investigate the relationship between the psychological status and the outcomes of vision rehabilitation in patients with low vision.

Methods: : We recruited 25 patients (age range 51 to 85 years) who were enrolled in the Vision Impairment Center to Optimize Remaining Sight (VICTORS) program at the Jesse Brown VAMC that provides magnification devices and training. The patients’ visual acuities in their better eyes ranged from 0.18 to 1.08 logMAR. We administered self–report batteries that measure perceived psychological health and include Adaptation to Vision Loss (AVL) Scale, a questionnaire designed to measure self–esteem and confidence, the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2 (MMPI–2), and the Mini–Mental Status Exam (MMSE), and reading assessments including The Pepper Visual Skills for Reading Test (measures reading speed and accuracy), and the MNRead Acuity Charts (measures reading acuity, reading speed and critical print size). Psychological batteries and reading assessments were administered on the first day of rehabilitation. Reading assessments and the AVL Scale were also administered at the end of rehabilitation.

Results: : Overall, patients showed significant improvement in reading speed (t’s=–2.97 to –4.39, p’s<0.01), accuracy (W’s=182.00 to 212.00, p’s<0.01), reading acuity (t’s=5.09 to 5.18, p’s<0.001) and critical print size (t’s=2.33 to 2.46, p’s<0.03) after rehabilitation. Regression analyses revealed that better reading outcomes were significantly related in weighted combination to lower levels of depression, higher self–confidence, and better visual acuity (R’s=0.587 to 0.814, p’s <0.02).

Conclusions: : Patients may benefit more from a training program if depression is effectively reduced prior to vision rehabilitation.

Keywords: low vision • quality of life • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: outcomes/complications 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×