May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
A Retrospective Study of Adverse Reactions With the Infusion of Verteporfin for Photodynamic Therapy Using a Standardized Data Collection Form
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M.L. Hom
    Ophthalmology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
    Pacific Vision Foundation, San Francisco, CA
  • R.N. Johnson
    Ophthalmology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
    Ophthalmology, West Coast Retina Medical Group, San Francisco, CA
  • H.R. McDonald
    Ophthalmology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
    Ophthalmology, West Coast Retina Medical Group, San Francisco, CA
  • E. Ai
    Ophthalmology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
    Ophthalmology, West Coast Retina Medical Group, San Francisco, CA
  • J.M. Jumper
    Ophthalmology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
    Ophthalmology, West Coast Retina Medical Group, San Francisco, CA
  • A.D. Fu
    Ophthalmology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
    Ophthalmology, West Coast Retina Medical Group, San Francisco, CA
  • S.S. Yang
    Ophthalmology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
    Ophthalmology, West Coast Retina Medical Group, San Francisco, CA
  • M.J. Goff
    Ophthalmology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
    Ophthalmology, West Coast Retina Medical Group, San Francisco, CA
  • H.T. Pham
    Ophthalmology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
    Pacific Vision Foundation, San Francisco, CA
  • C. Reynolds
    Ophthalmology, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M.L. Hom, None; R.N. Johnson, None; H.R. McDonald, None; E. Ai, None; J.M. Jumper, None; A.D. Fu, None; S.S. Yang, None; M.J. Goff, None; H.T. Pham, None; C. Reynolds, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Pacific Vision Foundation
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 303. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M.L. Hom, R.N. Johnson, H.R. McDonald, E. Ai, J.M. Jumper, A.D. Fu, S.S. Yang, M.J. Goff, H.T. Pham, C. Reynolds; A Retrospective Study of Adverse Reactions With the Infusion of Verteporfin for Photodynamic Therapy Using a Standardized Data Collection Form . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):303.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: We reviewed the side effects and adverse events associated with the infusion of verteporfin for photodynamic therapy. Methods: The clinical histories and outcomes of 212 consecutive patients receiving photodynamic therapy with verteporfin were reviewed. Side effects associated at the time of infusion were documented. Results:A total of 212 patients (79 men, 133 women) were treated for CNV with photodynamic therapy with verteporfin. The average number of treatments per patient was 2.4 with a total number of 505 treatments. Thirty–six patients (17%) experienced a non–ocular adverse reaction during or peri–infusion of verteporfin. These adverse reactions included back pain, chest pain, leg pain, pelvic pain, and/or arm pain. All reactions were observed within minutes of the infusion and were transient; occurring during the infusion and resolving shortly after the end of the infusion. The most frequent side effect noted by patients was back pain occuring with infusion and resolving at completion of treatment. Previous treatments did not appear to coincide with the likelihood of side effects. Types of side effect reactions in patients receiving multiple treatments were found to be inconsistent. Conclusions: The percentage of patients experiencing at least one non–ocular side effect associated with the infusion of verteporfin was noted in 17% of treated patients. The most frequent reaction was back pain during the infusion and was observed to be transient and mild. The incidence was greater than previous studies have documented (0.3%–2.4%). There appears to be no correlation between type of adverse reaction and age, sex, eye, and number of treatments.

Keywords: photodynamic therapy • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: treatment/prevention assessment/controlled • age-related macular degeneration 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×