May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Effect of Photodynamic Treatment for AMD on Reading Acuity, Text Acuity, Contrast Sensitivity and Visual Acuity
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D.T. Hartong
    Ophthalmology, University hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • R.P. H. M. Müskens
    Ophthalmology, University hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • A.E. Huiskamp
    Ophthalmology, University hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • J.M. M. Hooymans
    Ophthalmology, University hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • A.C. Kooijman
    Ophthalmology, University hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  D.T. Hartong, None; R.P.H.M. Müskens, None; A.E. Huiskamp, None; J.M.M. Hooymans, None; A.C. Kooijman, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 304. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D.T. Hartong, R.P. H. M. Müskens, A.E. Huiskamp, J.M. M. Hooymans, A.C. Kooijman; Effect of Photodynamic Treatment for AMD on Reading Acuity, Text Acuity, Contrast Sensitivity and Visual Acuity . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):304.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Visual function after photodynamic therapy (PDT) for age–related subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation is generally evaluated by measuring distant visual acuity. We investigated the effect of PDT on other aspects of visual function such as reading acuity, text acuity and contrast sensitivity, in order to determine its possibly additional value in clinical decision making. Methods: We compared the measurements of reading acuity (RA), text acuity (TA), and contrast sensitivity (CS) to visual acuity (ETDRS) measurements at baseline and after one year in 50 patients who received PDT for age–related subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation. RA and TA were measured with use of the Laboratory of Experimental Ophthalmology (LEO) chart. Visual acuity (VA) was measured with use of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) chart. CS was measured with the Pelli–Robson chart. For comparison all ETDRS and logarithmic scale results were transformed into an equal scale from 0 (no detection of visual function) to 100 (full visual function). Results: After transformation mean VA at baseline was 58.5±13.4 SD, mean CS was 65.0±15.0 SD, mean TA was 61.5±14.6, and mean RA was 55.1±14.7. After one year PDT–treatment, mean VA–loss was 9.8±23.9, mean CS loss was 6.7±23.6, mean TA loss was 12.0±22, and mean RA loss was 10.0±21.0. Mean values of CS, TA and RA did not significantly differ. The loss of VA was significantly correlated to CS loss (r=0.54,p<0.001), TA loss (r=0.64, p<0.001) and RA loss (r=0.72, p<0.001). Conclusions: Measurements of reading acuity, text acuity and contrast sensitivity at baseline and after one year of PDT–treatment seem to correlate well to the measurements of ETDRS letter counting. For this reason, extensive measurements of visual function may not be of additional value in clinical decision making.

Keywords: age-related macular degeneration • photodynamic therapy • visual acuity 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×