May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Improved Automated Digital Retinal Image Analysis for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy Through Image Quality Restoration
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • P. Soliz
    Technology Exploitation,
    Kestrel Corporation, Albuquerque, NM
  • B. Raman
    Biomedical Imaging Division,
    Kestrel Corporation, Albuquerque, NM
  • S. Nemeth
    Biomedical Imaging Division,
    Kestrel Corporation, Albuquerque, NM
  • S. Barriga
    Biomedical Imaging Division,
    Kestrel Corporation, Albuquerque, NM
  • G. Zamora
    Biomedical Imaging Division,
    Kestrel Corporation, Albuquerque, NM
  • E. Bursell
    Joslin Vision Network, Boston, MA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  P. Soliz, Kestrel Corporation I, E; B. Raman, Kestrel Corporation E; S. Nemeth, Kestrel Corporation E; S. Barriga, Kestrel Corporation E; G. Zamora, Kestrel Corporation E; E. Bursell, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Grant# 1R43EY014493–01A1, Rosansky Foundation, DAMD 17–03–2–0062, The Osiason Educational Foundation
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 359. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      P. Soliz, B. Raman, S. Nemeth, S. Barriga, G. Zamora, E. Bursell; Improved Automated Digital Retinal Image Analysis for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy Through Image Quality Restoration . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):359.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Image quality greatly affects the effectiveness with which human graders and computer–based systems can perform diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening using digital retinal images. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the significance of two critical methodologies for improving technical image quality after image acquisition on the sensitivity and specificity for detecting retinopathy in diabetic patients. Methods: A total of N= 42 subjects (N=74 eyes, 33% with no diabetic retinopathy (NDR) and 67% with diabetic retinopathy (DR)) were processed. One set of data were provided by the Joslin Vision Network system which uses a non–mydriatic digital color fundus camera. A second set was collected through a dilated pupil. This algorithm is based on Marr’s vision model for edge detection and its tolerance for significant illumination differences, as in shadows. Additionally, image blur due to ocular aberrations or camera de–focus were corrected analytically. Segmentation of the micro–aneurysms was performed. A trained retinal grader determined which of the segmented objects were either true positives or false negatives, i.e. ground truth. The segmentation process was performed on the un–processed and the enhanced images. A comparison of the clinical sensitivity and specificity was performed for the same classification algorithm when using the unprocessed and enhanced images. Results: The MA segmentation algorithm had a sensitivity and specificity of 69% and 66% when applied to the unprocessed non–mydriatic images. After image enhancement, the sensitivity and specificity improved to 98 and 75%. For the mydriatic images, the initial sensitivity and specificity were 75 and 70% or the unprocessed and 98 and 82 % for the enhanced images. Conclusions: Often retinal images present with unwanted shadows that may mask pathology to the human grader and the computer–based analysis system. Image processing algorithms are needed to compensate for these artifacts.

Keywords: image processing • diabetic retinopathy • imaging/image analysis: clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×