May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Assessment of a Diabetic Retinopathy Grading System Designed for a Method of Screening Using Three Color Fundus Photographs
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A. Lecleire–Collet
    Ophthalmology, Rouen Univ Hosp Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France
  • A. Erginay
    Ophthalmology, Lariboisière Hospital, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
  • A. Gaudric
    Ophthalmology, Lariboisière Hospital, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
  • G. Brasseur
    Ophthalmology, Rouen Univ Hosp Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France
  • P. Massin
    Ophthalmology, Lariboisière Hospital, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  A. Lecleire–Collet, None; A. Erginay, None; A. Gaudric, None; G. Brasseur, None; P. Massin, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 375. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A. Lecleire–Collet, A. Erginay, A. Gaudric, G. Brasseur, P. Massin; Assessment of a Diabetic Retinopathy Grading System Designed for a Method of Screening Using Three Color Fundus Photographs . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):375.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To validate a simplified diabetic retinopathy (DR) grading system designed for a method of screening using three color fundus photographs, and the severity level requiring referral. Methods: The screening grading system consists of five severity levels for DR (no DR (level 0), mild non proliferative DR (level 1), moderate non proliferative DR (level 2), severe non proliferative DR (level 3), and proliferative DR (level 4)) and two levels for maculopathy. The level 2 of the DR grading system is defined as more than 20 microaneurisms and/or dot hemorrhages, or a number of blot hemorrhages ranging from 1 to 10, or less than 3 IRMA, or 2 or more cotton wool spots, on the whole three fundus fields. The screening test was three 45° fundus color photographs (posterior pole, nasal, and temporal) obtained with a non–mydriatic camera in 100 diabetic patients (200 eyes). The grading results according to the screening grading system were compared to the reference diagnosis, from either ETDRS stereoscopic photographs, or a mozaic of nine color fundus photographs. Results: Exact agreement between the grading of the three photographs according to the screening grading system and the reference diagnosis was 95.8 % (weighted ĸ statistics: 0.99) for DR, and 94.1 % (weighted ĸ statistics: 0.93) for maculopathy. When the retinopathy level requiring referral was ≥ 2, the sensitivity and the specificity for the detection of moderate non–proliferative DR or more severe scales were 100 % and 92.3 % respectively. When the maculopathy level requiring referral was 1 (hard exudates within one disc diameter from macular center), the sensitivity and the specificity for the detection of maculopathy were 92.3 % and 96 % respectively. Conclusions: This grading system allows to define sensitive and specific levels requiring referral, and seems to be suitable for a method of screening using three color fundus photographs.

Keywords: diabetic retinopathy 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×