May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Identification of Novel Diagnostic Marker Candidates for Diabetic Retinopathy by Serological Proteome Analysis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • H. Oh
    Ophthalmology/Severance Hospital, Yonsei Univ Coll of Med, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Y.–J. Cho
    R&D Center, EyeGene Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • N.–G. Lee
    Sejong University, Department of Bioscience & Biotechnology, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • S. Lee
    Ophthalmology, Soon Chun Hyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • O. Kwon
    Ophthalmology/Severance Hospital, Yonsei Univ Coll of Med, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  H. Oh, None; Y. Cho, None; N. Lee, None; S. Lee, None; O. Kwon, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 426. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      H. Oh, Y.–J. Cho, N.–G. Lee, S. Lee, O. Kwon; Identification of Novel Diagnostic Marker Candidates for Diabetic Retinopathy by Serological Proteome Analysis . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):426.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Circulating autoantibodies specific to retinal proteins have been associated with retinal destruction in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DMR). However, there is a little information on the prevalence of autoantibodies. The aim of the study was to identify an autoantigen profile against retinal proteins in DMR serum, and to evaluate the usefulness of identified proteins on the diagnosis of DR. Methods: We screened the presence of anti–retina protein antibodies with normal donor, diabetes mellitus (DM) patients and DMR patients using 1–DE immunoblotting and the proteomics technique, with 2–DE immunoblotting and ESI–MS/MS was used to identify anti–retinal antibodies. And then we confirmed the expression level of autoantibody in each patient sera or normal sera by ELISA to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of autoantibody. Results: There was a higher incidence of anti–retinal autoantibodies in DMR than DM or normal donors. We chose the 22 spots in 2–DE immunoblotting, and identified a total of 19 proteins associated with diabetic retinopathy. We selected the aldolase C that have the strongest potential of autoantigens related with diabetic retinopathy. The anti–aldolase autoantibody content in DMR patient sera were increased as compared to DM patient sera (DM versus NPDR, p < 0.001; DM versus PDR, p < 0.001). However, comparisons of the autoantibody level in severity of retinopathy with NPDR and PDR, was not quite significant (NPDR versus PDR, p = 0.027). Conclusions: The identification of anti–retinal autoantibodies in DMR suggests that the autoantibodies in serum may be useful as a diagnostic marker of diagnosis of DMR.

Keywords: diabetic retinopathy • clinical laboratory testing 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×