May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Comparison of Pattern ERG, Multifocal ERG and Psychophysical Correlates of Fundus Autofluorescence Abnormalities in Patients With Cone–rod (RPGR, RIM1) or Rod–cone Dystrophy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A.G. Robson
    Electrophysiology,
    Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • M. Michaelides
    Medical Retina,
    Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
    Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
  • A.R. Webster
    Medical Retina,
    Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
    Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
  • A.C. Bird
    Medical Retina,
    Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
    Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
  • A.T. Moore
    Medical Retina,
    Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
    Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
  • F.W. Fitzke
    Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
  • G.E. Holder
    Electrophysiology,
    Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  A.G. Robson, None; M. Michaelides, None; A.R. Webster, None; A.C. Bird, None; A.T. Moore, None; F.W. Fitzke, None; G.E. Holder, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Foundation Fighting Blindness (AGR)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 552. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A.G. Robson, M. Michaelides, A.R. Webster, A.C. Bird, A.T. Moore, F.W. Fitzke, G.E. Holder; Comparison of Pattern ERG, Multifocal ERG and Psychophysical Correlates of Fundus Autofluorescence Abnormalities in Patients With Cone–rod (RPGR, RIM1) or Rod–cone Dystrophy . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):552.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To compare multi–focal and pattern electroretinography (mfERG, PERG) and fine matrix mapping (FMM) in patients with cone–rod or rod–cone dystrophy and annular macular abnormalities present on fundus autofluorescence imaging (AF). Methods: Fundus AF was performed on patients with cone–rod (CORDX1 associated with RPGR or CORD7 associated with RIM1) or rod–cone dystrophy diagnosed by ISCEV–standard ERGs. Mf ERG, PERG and fine matrix mapping (FMM) were performed. Results: Patients with cone–rod dystrophy had annuli of high density AF that bordered central areas of low density in older RPGR cases and most RIM1 cases. PERG P50 amplitude was inversely related to the size of the AF ring. In two RPGR patients, mfERGs showed widespread reduction with relative sparing over the foveal area. FMM showed reduced sensitivity, worse over areas of high density AF. In RIM1 patients, high density areas bordered central atrophic lesions and were spatially concordant with a gradient of sensitivity loss. AF rings encircled areas of preserved photopic function in rod–cone dystrophy with normal acuity. One patient, monitored over 4 years, showed AF evidence of progressive constriction of the ring of increased AF. Conclusions: The high correspondence between PERG, mfERG and fine matrix mapping in patients with cone–rod and rod–cone dystrophy and abnormalities in autofluorescence imaging, suggests that high density areas of autofluorescence reflect underlying functional disturbances. AF rings may constrict with time in patients with rod–cone dystrophy.

Keywords: retinal degenerations: hereditary • electroretinography: clinical • imaging/image analysis: clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×