May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
S–Cone Connections of OFF Midget Bipolar Cells in the Retina of a New World Monkey
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • U. Grunert
    Optometry & Vision Sciences, University Melbourne, National Vision Research Instititute of Australia, Australia
  • S.C. S. Lee
    Optometry & Vision Sciences, University Melbourne, National Vision Research Instititute of Australia, Australia
  • I. Telkes
    Optometry & Vision Sciences, University Melbourne, National Vision Research Instititute of Australia, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  U. Grunert, None; S.C.S. Lee, None; I. Telkes, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NHMRC Grant 299800
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 608. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      U. Grunert, S.C. S. Lee, I. Telkes; S–Cone Connections of OFF Midget Bipolar Cells in the Retina of a New World Monkey . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):608.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose:To investigate whether there is an anatomical pathway from short–wavelength sensitive (S) cones to flat (OFF) midget bipolar cells in the marmoset retina. Methods: Retinae of marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1M PB for 2 or 3 hours. Retinal pieces or horizontal sections were processed for double immunofluorescence with antibodies to CD15 to stain flat midget bipolar (FMB) cells, and an antiserum to S–cone opsin (JH455) to stain S–cones including their pedicles. Some sections were additionally labelled with peanut agglutinin (PNA) coupled to a fluorescent marker to identify the pedicles of all cone types. Sections were analysed using a deconvolution microscope (Zeiss). Results: In all retinae analysed, CD15–labelled FMB cells formed distinct dendritic clusters located opposite M/L–cone but not opposite S–cone pedicles. In peripheral retina, 95 S–cone pedicles were analysed with respect to their connections to FMB cells. Only 22 (23%) of the S–cones contacted FMB cells. In central retina, 285 S–cone pedicles were analysed, of these, 66 (23%) contacted FMB cells. At all eccentricities the contacts made between S–cones and FMB cells were sparse, i.e. only a few FMB dendrites but no clusters were seen to contact S–cone pedicles. Conclusions: Our results suggest that in marmoset retina, S–cones do not provide strong OFF input to the midget–parvocellular pathway. Whether our results indicate a difference in the S–cone connectivity between Old World and New World primates remains to be determined.

Keywords: retinal connections, networks, circuitry • retina: distal (photoreceptors, horizontal cells, bipolar cells) • color vision 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×