May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
High–Order Total Ocular Aberrations After Cataract Surgery With Hydrophobic Acrylic (MA60AC, ALCON) and Hydrophilic Acrylic (XLSTABI, IOLTECH) Intraocular Lens
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • C. Rohart
    Ophthalmology, Fondation Ophtalmologique de Rothschild, Paris, France
  • D. Gatinel
    Ophthalmology, Fondation Ophtalmologique de Rothschild, Paris, France
  • T. Hoang–Xuan
    Ophthalmology, Fondation Ophtalmologique de Rothschild, Paris, France
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  C. Rohart, None; D. Gatinel, None; T. Hoang–Xuan, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 705. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      C. Rohart, D. Gatinel, T. Hoang–Xuan; High–Order Total Ocular Aberrations After Cataract Surgery With Hydrophobic Acrylic (MA60AC, ALCON) and Hydrophilic Acrylic (XLSTABI, IOLTECH) Intraocular Lens . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):705.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To compare high–order aberrations (HOA) in patients who had cataract surgery and implantation of 2 types of acrylic intraocular lens ( hydrophobic MA 60 AC or hydrophilic XLSTABI). Methods: Forty eyes were included in this study. Eyes of group I ( n = 20 ) received an acrylic hydrophobic ( MA 60 AC) and eyes of group II (n = 20 ) received an acrylic hydrophilic ( XLSTABI) intraocular lens. Optical aberrations were measured with NIDEK OPD–SCAN at least one month after cataract surgery for a 6 mm pupil diameter using a sixth order Zernike polynomials decomposition. Results: In a group I, the root mean square (RMS) coefficient for the total higher aberration was 2.059 µm. The RMS of the tilt, coma, trefoil, tetrafoil, spherical aberration and secondary astigmatism were 0.848, 0.368, 0.524, 0.077, 0.319 et 0.153 µm, respectively. In a group II, the RMS coefficient for the total higher aberration was 2.464 µm. The RMS of the tilt, coma, trefoil, tetrafoil, spherical aberration and secondary astigmatism were 0.520, 0.220, 0.520, 0.017, 0.290 et 0.136 µm, respectively. There was statistical difference in HOA between the two groups for the tilt and the coma aberration (P<0.05). There was more aberrations in MA60AC. Conclusions: There was statistical difference between the two groups regarding the magnitude of HOA.

Keywords: optical properties • cataract 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×