May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Kinetics of in vitro Lysozyme Deposition on Silicone Hydrogel, Group II and Group IV Contact Lens Materials
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • L.N. Subbaraman
    School of Optometry, Centre for Contact Lens Research, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
  • M. Senchyna
    School of Optometry, Centre for Contact Lens Research, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
    Alcon Research Ltd, Fort Worth, TX
  • L. Jones
    School of Optometry, Centre for Contact Lens Research, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  L.N. Subbaraman, None; M. Senchyna, Alcon Research Ltd, Fort Worth, TX, USA F; L. Jones, Alcon Research Ltd, Fort Worth, TX, USA F.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NSERC and Alcon
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 910. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      L.N. Subbaraman, M. Senchyna, L. Jones; Kinetics of in vitro Lysozyme Deposition on Silicone Hydrogel, Group II and Group IV Contact Lens Materials . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):910.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine lysozyme deposition as a function of time in group IV, group II and silicone hydrogel (SH) contact lens materials by artificially doping lenses with 125I labeled lysozyme. Methods: 4 individual Acuvue (AV; Gp IV), SofLens 66 (SL; Gp II) and SH lenses (Focus Night&Day (FND), PureVision (PV) and Acuvue Advance (AA)) were doped in 1mL of simple lysozyme solution (1.9 mg/ml) containing 125I labeled lysozyme. The lenses were doped for time periods ranging from 1 hr to 28 days at 37o C with constant shaking. Following the specified doping period, the lenses were rinsed briefly with phosphate buffered saline to remove unbound protein and were then placed in polypropylene tubes and counted in a Beckman Gamma Counter. The amount of protein adsorbed to the lenses was calculated by dividing the counts on the lenses by the specific activity of the protein. Results: Lysozyme accumulated rapidly on AV lenses (1 hr, 98±8 µg/lens), reached a maximum on the 7th day (1386±21 µg/lens) and then reached a plateau, with no further increase occurring (p=NS). Lysozyme accumulation on Gp II and SH lenses continued to increase across all time periods, with no plateau being observed (p<0.05). At 7 days, FND lenses deposited 1.8±0.4 µg of lysozyme per lens while PV and AA lenses deposited 5.9±2 and 3.6±1 µg of lysozyme respectively. After 28 days of doping, FND lenses deposited 4.2±1 µg of lysozyme per lens while PV and AA lenses deposited 19.4±3 and 16.8±4 µg of lysozyme respectively. Conclusions: Radiochemical analysis is a sensitive and effective technique to determine the small quantities of lysozyme deposited on SH lenses. The kinetics of contact lens deposition depends on the chemical structure of lens material under consideration. Lysozyme deposition occurs rapidly with Gp IV materials before reaching a maximum, while SH and Gp II materials progressively accumulate lysozyme, with no plateau occurring.

Keywords: contact lens 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×