May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Experimental Autoimmune Uveitis Induced by Murine Retinoid–Binding Protein 3 (RBP–3) 1–16
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • C.J. Guyver
    Pathology and Microbiology,
    Bristol University, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • C.J. Calder
    Pathology and Microbiology,
    Bristol University, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • D.A. Copland
    Pathology and Microbiology,
    Bristol University, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • A.D. Dick
    Infection and Immunity, Department of Clinical Sciences,
    Bristol University, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • L.B. Nicholson
    Pathology and Microbiology,
    Bristol University, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  C.J. Guyver, None; C.J. Calder, None; D.A. Copland, None; A.D. Dick, None; L.B. Nicholson, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NERC & The University of Bristol
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 985. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      C.J. Guyver, C.J. Calder, D.A. Copland, A.D. Dick, L.B. Nicholson; Experimental Autoimmune Uveitis Induced by Murine Retinoid–Binding Protein 3 (RBP–3) 1–16 . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):985.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) can be induced in rodents following immunisation with retinal proteins or peptides derived from them. Peptide 1–20 of human retinoid–binding protein 3 (hRBP–3 1–20) (previously IRBP) is immunogenic and pathogenic in C57Bl/6 mice (H–2b), but has some experimental disadvantages. hRBP–3 1–20 is insoluble in water and its sequence at position 17 (valine) differs from that of murine RBP–3 (mRBP–3) (isoleucine). A new peptide has been synthesised, mRBP–3 1–16, that overcomes these problems. Altered peptide ligands (APLs) of mRBP–3 1–16 have also been generated. Methods: Disease induction following immunisation with mRBP–3 1–16 vs. hRBP–3 1–20 was studied by histological analysis. The phenotype of T cells from mice immunised with either peptide was compared, along with the phenotype of mRBP–3 1–16–reactive T cell clones. The in vitro characteristics of mRBP–3 1–16–reactive T cells and the mRBP–3 1–16–reactive T cell clones in response to activation with the mRBP–3 1–16 APLs were also analysed. Results: mRBP–3 1–16 induces EAU in C57Bl/6 mice with severity and kinetics comparable to that following immunisation with hRBP–3 1–20. T cells taken from mice immunised with mRBP–3 1–16 have a Th1 phenotype, and proliferate in response to reactivation with either mRBP–3 1–16, hRBP–3 1–20 or mRBP–3 1–16 APLs. mRBP–3 1–16–reactive T cell clones show a range of proliferation levels and cytokine production upon stimulation with the above peptides. APLs elicit at least three distinct patterns of reactivity when tested with the T cell clones. Conclusions: mRBP–3 1–16 can immunise and cause EAU. The studies using T cell clones and APLs demonstrate that the immune response to mRBP–3 1–16 is drawn from a diverse population of antigen–specific T cells.

Keywords: autoimmune disease • inflammation • microglia 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×