May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Macular Thickness Measurement Reproducibility Within Patient and Session by the OCT3
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • E.L. Lambert
    Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences,
    University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI
  • D. Wu
    Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences,
    University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI
  • A. Goulding
    Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences,
    University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI
  • L.–Y. Lee
    Biostatistics & Medical Informatics,
    University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI
  • M. Fisher
    Biostatistics & Medical Informatics,
    University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI
  • R.P. Danis
    Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences,
    University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  E.L. Lambert, None; D. Wu, None; A. Goulding, None; L. Lee, None; M. Fisher, None; R.P. Danis, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 1546. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      E.L. Lambert, D. Wu, A. Goulding, L.–Y. Lee, M. Fisher, R.P. Danis; Macular Thickness Measurement Reproducibility Within Patient and Session by the OCT3 . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):1546.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Replicate OCT images on normal and diseased eyes submitted to a central reading center for clinical trial certification were evaluated for reproducibility of macular thickness measurements given the conditions of the same patient, session, equipment and operator. Methods: Patient selection was determined at the clinical site for purposes of obtaining OCT operator certification. Certification applicants were asked to submit replicate fast macular thickness map scans of one "normal" eye (defined as an eye without obvious macular pathology) and one eye with the disease under study (either wet AMD or macular edema). All OCT3 sets submitted between Nov 2002 and Nov 2004 (n=281) were analyzed for differences between center point thickness measurements, center point standard deviations, and grid subfield measurements in the replicate scans. Center point thickness was used to create subgroups defined as < 175, 176–225, 226–325, 326–425, > 426 microns; these contained 87, 56, 45, 48, and 45 eyes respectively. Results: The mean absolute difference between replicate scan center point measurements increased with retinal thickness from 6 microns in the subgroup < 175 microns up to 23 microns in the > 426 microns subgroup (p<0.001). A similar relationship was observed for the center, inner, and outer subfields. For all 281 eyes, the overall mean absolute difference was 14 microns for the center point thickness (mean 284), 9 for the standard deviation of the center point (mean 14), 8 for the center subfield (mean 301), 20 for the inner subfields (mean 1253), and 19 for the outer subfields (mean 1032). Conclusions: Replicate OCT scans obtained in selected cooperative patients under optimal conditions demonstrate increasing variability with greater retinal thickness measurements, but quite modest mean absolute differences. These results suggest the standard deviation of the center point of the fast macular thickness map or another measure may be a useful quality metric.

Keywords: imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • retina • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×