May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Quantifying Visual Acuity in Lowest–Vision Patients using the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • K. Schulze–Bonsel
    University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Freiburg, Germany
  • N. Feltgen
    University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Freiburg, Germany
  • H. Burau
    University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Freiburg, Germany
  • L.L. Hansen
    University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Freiburg, Germany
  • M. Bach
    University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Freiburg, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  K. Schulze–Bonsel, None; N. Feltgen, None; H. Burau, None; L.L. Hansen, None; M. Bach, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 1933. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      K. Schulze–Bonsel, N. Feltgen, H. Burau, L.L. Hansen, M. Bach; Quantifying Visual Acuity in Lowest–Vision Patients using the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):1933.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: The visual acuity (VA) of patients with very low vision is classified using the semi–quantitative ordinal scale "Counting Fingers" (CF), "Hand Motion" (HM), "Light Perception" (LP) and "No Light Perception". More quantitative measures would be desirable, especially as motion is a different visual sub–modality. We compared the results of clinical VA measures, ETDRS charts and the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test (FrACT). The FrACT is a computerized visual acuity test, which can present very large Landolt C optotypes when necessary. Methods: We examined 107 eyes of 100 patients with various eye diseases (e.g. diabetic retinopathy, or ARMD), covering a range of VA from LP to decimal 0.32. The ETDRS charts were presented at a distance of 50 cm or 100 cm. The FrACT optotypes were presented on a 17" monitor at a distance of 50 cm and viewed monocularly. The responses were entered by the examiner, based on the patients' verbal responses. After extensive training, two ETDRS and FrACT measures were obtained in a block design, alternating in successive patients (ABBA/BAAB). All statistical evaluations were done on the nearly normally distributed log(VA)=–MAR scale. Results: For VA ≥0.02, clinical VA, ETDRS and FrACT coincided closely without systematic deviation and with a mean CV of 15±;11%. ETDRS could successfully be obtained down to CF (test–retest, averaged over all patients, CVETDRS=9±;8%), FrACT provided reproducible measures down to HM (test–retest CVFrACT=12±;11%). For CF (n=6) both ETDRS and FrACT resulted in a mean VA of 0.014±;0.001 (range 0.01 to 0.02). The VA results of FrACT for HM (n=12) were 0.005±;0.001 (range 0.003 to 0.009), the individual values were highly reproducible. For HM no results could be obtained using ETDRS. In the 2 patients with LP no successful measurement could be carried out with ETDRS nor FrACT. Conclusions: The excellent agreement of the three acuity procedures above VA=0.02 cross–validates all three of them, in particular the less widely used FrACT. The clinical category "CF" can be replaced by 0.014 using ETDRS or FrACT, with the latter technique even reproducibly quantifying VA in the hand motion range, around a VA of 0.005.

Keywords: low vision • visual acuity • clinical research methodology 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×