May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
AP–1 and COX–2 Expression in Corneal Epithelium Following Anti–Glaucomatous Eyedrops
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Y. Okada
    Department of Ophthalmology,
    Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
  • S. Saika
    Department of Ophthalmology,
    Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
  • K. Shirai
    Department of Ophthalmology,
    Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
  • T. Miyamoto
    Department of Ophthalmology,
    Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
  • O. Yamanaka
    Department of Ophthalmology,
    Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
  • T. Ueyama
    Department of Anatomy,
    Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
  • Y. Ohnishi
    Department of Ophthalmology,
    Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Y. Okada, None; S. Saika, None; K. Shirai, None; T. Miyamoto, None; O. Yamanaka, None; T. Ueyama, None; Y. Ohnishi, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 2115. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Y. Okada, S. Saika, K. Shirai, T. Miyamoto, O. Yamanaka, T. Ueyama, Y. Ohnishi; AP–1 and COX–2 Expression in Corneal Epithelium Following Anti–Glaucomatous Eyedrops . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):2115.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To examine the expression pattern of stress–related genes, c–fos and c–jun, both the major components of AP–1, and cyclooxygenase–2(COX–2) in rat corneal epithelium treated with anti–glaucomatous eyedrops. Methods: Seventy–six male Wistar rats were used. We dropped anti–glaucomatous eyedrops (0.5%timolol, 0.005%latanoprost or 0.12%unoprostone) on the one eye of rat. The affected eyes were enucleated after various intervals. Frozen sections were processed for in situ hybridization with c–fos, c–jun and COX–2 mRNAs or were stained with anti–c–Fos and anti–COX–2 antibodies. Results: Thirty min after dropping 0.5%timolol, signals for c–fos and c–jun mRNAs were detected in the corneal epithelium. Thirty to 60 min after dropping 0.005%latanoprost or 0.12%unoprostone, signals for c–fos and c–jun mRNAs were detected in the corneal epithelium. Thirty to 90 min after dropping 0.005%latanoprost or 0.12%unoprostone, signals for COX–2 mRNA was detected in the corneal epithelium. These signals were no longer evident at 120 min. c–Fos protein was detected in the corneal epithelium 120 min after dropping 0.5%timolol, 0.005%latanoprost or 0.12%unoprostone. COX–2 protein was detected in the corneal epithelium 120 min after dropping 0.005%latanoprost or 0.12%unoprostone. Conclusions: Corneal epithelial cells are transiently transcriptionally activated at a very early phase following anti–glaucomatous eyedrops. Expression of COX–2 following these eyedrops may potentially induce inflammatory response in cornea.

Keywords: drug toxicity/drug effects • cornea: epithelium • in situ hybridization 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×