May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Responses of Different Retinal Ganglion Cell Types to Motion of 'Natural' Scenes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • K.A. Koch
    Neurosci./Physics, U. of Penn., Philadelphia, PA
  • J. McLean
    Neurosci./Physics, U. of Penn., Philadelphia, PA
  • N. Tkachuk
    Mol. Bio., Princeton U., Princeton, NJ
  • R. Segev
    Mol. Bio., Princeton U., Princeton, NJ
  • M. Berry
    Mol. Bio., Princeton U., Princeton, NJ
  • M. Freed
    Neurosci./Physics, U. of Penn., Philadelphia, PA
  • V. Balasubramanian
    Neurosci./Physics, U. of Penn., Philadelphia, PA
  • P. Sterling
    Neurosci./Physics, U. of Penn., Philadelphia, PA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  K.A. Koch, None; J. McLean, None; N. Tkachuk, None; R. Segev, None; M. Berry, None; M. Freed, None; V. Balasubramanian, None; P. Sterling, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grants T32 EY07035, RO1 EY14196, RO1 EY013333, RO1 EY00828 and NSF Grant IBN 0344678
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 2277. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      K.A. Koch, J. McLean, N. Tkachuk, R. Segev, M. Berry, M. Freed, V. Balasubramanian, P. Sterling; Responses of Different Retinal Ganglion Cell Types to Motion of 'Natural' Scenes . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):2277.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Abstract:
 

Study ganglion cell responses to ‘natural’ stimuli.

 

Scenes from nature were projected onto the mammalian retina to simulate motion: saccades, optic flow, object motion, and fixational eye movements. We studied 7 ganglion cell types: ON and OFF brisk–transient, ON and OFF brisk–sustained, ON and ON–OFF direction–selective (DS), and local–edge. Peak rate was the highest 5 ms time bin in the PSTH; firing fraction was the fraction of time bins during which a cell fired ≥ 5% of its peak. Temporal precision was measured by spike time jitter across stimulus repeats. Spike–count distributions were computed with sliding windows of 100–500ms. Information rates were estimated by the direct method. Efficiency was information rate normalized by the maximum possible information at the average spike rate. Results are compared by independent t–test.

 

ON and OFF brisk cells were similar and thus pooled. For all types of motion brisk–transient and brisk–sustained cells had the highest average spike rates (p<0.05). Brisk–transient cells had the highest peak rates (p<0.005), and local–edge cells had the lowest (p<0.01 except ON DS). Responses were sparse: most cells had firing fractions <0.5. Brisk–sustained cells had the highest fractions (p<0.05 except local–edge). Brisk–transient and ON–OFF DS types were more precise than brisk–sustained cells (p<0.005), and local–edge cells were by far the least precise (p<0.005). Spike–count distributions were approximately exponential and highly skewed toward zero spikes per time window. However, cells with the highest average spike rates had less skewed, dome–shaped distributions, with peaks greater than zero. Brisk cells showed the highest information rates (p<0.05). Yet for each type and stimulus, information rate was about 30% of the maximum that the cell could transmit at its average spike rate; efficiency for all cells was ∼ 0.30.

 

 

All types of motion evoke similar responses. Each cell type responds to natural stimuli with distinct spike train statistics. Yet different types transmit with similar efficiency.

 

 
Keywords: electrophysiology: non-clinical • retina: proximal (bipolar, amacrine, and ganglion cells) • ganglion cells 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×