May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
The Role of Tetracyclines in Healing of Canine Refractory Ulcers
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • H.L. Chandler
    Veterinary Biosciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • C.M. H. Colitz
    Veterinary Biosciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • W.W. Miller
    Animal Ophthalmology Clinic, Memphis, TN
  • D.F. Kusewitt
    Veterinary Biosciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  H.L. Chandler, None; C.M.H. Colitz, None; W.W. Miller, None; D.F. Kusewitt, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  American Animal Hospital Foundation
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 2597. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      H.L. Chandler, C.M. H. Colitz, W.W. Miller, D.F. Kusewitt; The Role of Tetracyclines in Healing of Canine Refractory Ulcers . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):2597.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Re–epithelialization in refractory corneal ulcers does not occur properly. Normal corneal re–epithelialization resembles the process of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), the transformation of epithelial cells into more fibroblastic cells. EMT is initiated by growth factors like transforming growth factor–ß (TGF–ß) that stimulate production of Slug. Slug modulates changes in cell adhesion and motility leading to EMT and is required for normal corneal epithelial cell (CEC) migration. Tetracyclines enhance TGF–ß expression. We hypothesize that tetracycline stimulation of TGF–ß activity leads to increased expression of Slug and, ultimately, to the EMT–like changes required for successful corneal wound healing. Methods: Canine refractory corneal ulcers were examined to determine levels of expression of Slug and its putative target genes. Western blotting and real–time RT–PCR were used to examine the expression of Slug protein and mRNA compared to normal corneas. Also, CEC were wounded in vitro and treated with oxytetracycline. Wound closure was monitored and RT–PCR performed to determine Slug expression. Cultured CEC were incubated with oxytetracycline and TGF–ß blocking antibody, and cell migration was monitored. Results: There was decreased expression of Slug protein and mRNA in refractory ulcers compared to normal corneas. Oxytetracycline increased both Slug expression and the rate of wound closure in cultured CEC compared to untreated controls. Blocking the TGF–ß pathway decreased the rate of cell migration in CEC treated with oxytetracycline. Conclusions: Refractory ulcers have even lower Slug expression than normal corneal epithelium, suggesting reduced stimulation of cell migration. In vitro treatment of wounded CEC with oxytetracycline enhanced wound closure and Slug expression. Blocking the TGF–ß pathway decreased the rate of cell migration in tetracycline–treated CEC, suggesting that tetracycline may use this pathway to stimulate wound closure. Treatment of refractory ulcers with tetracycline may increase the expression of Slug and its targets, thus allowing normal re–epithelialization to occur.

Keywords: cornea: basic science • wound healing • transcription factors 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×