May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Ocular Effects of Nepafenac Ophthalmic Suspension Following Three Months of Topical Ocular Administration to Cynomolgus Monkeys
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • L.M. Walker
    Toxicology, Alcon Research, Ltd, Fort Worth, TX
  • R.L. Rice
    Toxicology, Alcon Research, Ltd, Fort Worth, TX
  • J.D. Heaton
    Toxicology, Alcon Research, Ltd, Fort Worth, TX
  • R.B. Hackett
    Toxicology, Alcon Research, Ltd, Fort Worth, TX
  • R.J. Munger
    Animal Ophthalmology Clinic, Ltd, Dallas, TX
  • J.W. Hiddemen
    Toxicology, Alcon Research, Ltd, Fort Worth, TX
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  L.M. Walker, Alcon Research, Ltd E; R.L. Rice, Alcon Research, Ltd E; J.D. Heaton, Alcon Research, Ltd E; R.B. Hackett, Alcon Research, Ltd. E; R.J. Munger, Alcon Research, Ltd C, R; J.W. Hiddemen, Alcon Research, Ltd E.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Alcon Research, Ltd
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 2649. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      L.M. Walker, R.L. Rice, J.D. Heaton, R.B. Hackett, R.J. Munger, J.W. Hiddemen; Ocular Effects of Nepafenac Ophthalmic Suspension Following Three Months of Topical Ocular Administration to Cynomolgus Monkeys . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):2649.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine the ocular irritation and toxicity potential of various concentrations of Nepafenac Ophthalmic Suspension containing 0.005% benzalkonium chloride (BAK) as a result of subchronic topical ocular administration. Methods: Four groups of 8 cynomolgus monkeys each were randomly assigned to receive either 0.1, 0.3, 1.0% Nepafenac Ophthalmic Suspension containing 0.005% BAK as a preservative or vehicle. Two drops (total 80 microliters) were instilled into the right eye 4 times a day for approximately 3 months. The left eye served as an untreated control. The conjunctiva, cornea, anterior chamber, light reflex, lens, and iris of both eyes in all groups were examined by slit–lamp biomicroscopy prior to dosing and again on Study Days 6, 13, 27, 41, 55, 69, 83, 104, and 111. Indirect ophthalmoscopy, pachymetry, IOP, and specular microscopy of the central corneal endothelium were also performed. Vehicle means were compared with treatment group means to determine statistical differences (Dunnett’s test; P<.05) for IOP, pachymetry and specular microscopy parameters. At the end of the study, ocular tissues were submitted for histopathology. Results: Throughout the study period, slit–lamp biomicroscopy did not reveal treatment–related differences among groups in pupillary light reflex, aqueous flare, aqueous cells, corneal cloudiness, neovascularization, and fluorescein staining. The fundi remained normal. Pachymetry, IOP, and specular microscopy parameters (mean cell density, percent hexagon, or mean cell area) did not reveal treatment–related differences among groups. Histopathology revealed no treatment–related lesions or evidence of ocular irritation in the eyes, adnexa, or nasal–lacrimal tissue of any monkey in any treatment group. Conclusions: Over a 3–month period, 4–times daily dosing with Nepafenac Ophthalmic Suspension 0.1, 0.3, or 1.0% did not induce ocular irritation or ocular toxicity.

Keywords: cornea: basic science • inflammation 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×