May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Evaluation of Apparent Corneal Ectasia Displayed With Orbscan After Keratorefractive Surgery
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Y. Nawa
    Ophthalmology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
  • K. Masuda
    Ophthalmology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
  • T. Ueda
    Ophthalmology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
  • Y. Hara
    Ophthalmology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
  • H. Uozato
    Orthoptics and Visual Science, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Y. Nawa, None; K. Masuda, None; T. Ueda, None; Y. Hara, None; H. Uozato, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 2754. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Y. Nawa, K. Masuda, T. Ueda, Y. Hara, H. Uozato; Evaluation of Apparent Corneal Ectasia Displayed With Orbscan After Keratorefractive Surgery . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):2754.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Since Wang reported, corneal forward shift after keratorefractive surgery has been reported by many authors. However, we doubt corneal forward shift displayed with the difference map of Orbscan after myopic correction. The posterior surface of the cornea is observed through a lens, composed of the overlying epithelium and stroma. The lens changes its shape and refractive power after surgery. The difference map of Orbscan does not consider the difference of the magnification ratio. We propose a new idea why the cornea apparently shifts forward after myopic LASIK or PRK. Methods: The method to calculate the magnification ratio of the posterior surface of the cornea was described previously (Nawa et al, JCRS 2003). Using the method, we evaluated the relationship between the amount of myopic correction and apparent forward shift. Results: If we assume the preoperative corneal thickness is 600 micron, myopic correction is 10D, and postoperative corneal thickness is 480 micron, the posterior surface of the cornea become apparently smaller by 0.8%. If we assume the radius of curvature of the posterior cornea is 6200 micron, the posterior surface of the cornea become smaller by 50 micron. If it is directly translated to the difference map, the posterior cornea apparently shift forward by 50 micron. Conclusions: Surprisingly, the calculated relationship between the amount of correction and apparent forward shift well corresponds to the past reports. This report strongly suggests that most of the corneal forward shift displayed with Orbscan could be artifact.

Keywords: cornea: clinical science • shape and contour • laser 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×