May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Comparison of Micafungin and Fluconazole for Experimental Candida Keratitis in Rabbits
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • K. Masuzawa
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, Inst. of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba–city, Japan
  • T. Hiraoka
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, Inst. of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba–city, Japan
  • Y. Kaji
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, Inst. of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba–city, Japan
  • T. Wakabayashi
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, Inst. of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba–city, Japan
  • P.N. Nanbu
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, Inst. of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba–city, Japan
  • F. Okamoto
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, Inst. of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba–city, Japan
  • T. Oshika
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, Inst. of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba–city, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  K. Masuzawa, None; T. Hiraoka, None; Y. Kaji, None; T. Wakabayashi, None; P.N. Nanbu, None; F. Okamoto, None; T. Oshika, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 2778. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      K. Masuzawa, T. Hiraoka, Y. Kaji, T. Wakabayashi, P.N. Nanbu, F. Okamoto, T. Oshika; Comparison of Micafungin and Fluconazole for Experimental Candida Keratitis in Rabbits . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):2778.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of subconjunctival injection of 0.1% micafungin and 0.2% fluconazole in the treatment of experimental Candida albicans keratitis in rabbits. Methods: In 24 New Zealand white rabbits, Candida albicans (5×104 yeast cells) was inoculated in the corneal stroma of right eye. The animals were randomly assigned to three groups and received subconjunctival injection of 0.5 ml of 0.1% micafungin, 0.2% fluconazole, or physiologic saline once a day for three weeks. The eyes were examined slit–lamp biomicroscopically and histopathologically. Clinical course of fungal keratitis was compared between three groups. Results: The clinical scores were significantly lower in the micafungin group than the other two groups throughout the study period (P<0.0001 ∼ P=0.0027, Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test). The fluconazole group showed significantly lower clinical scores than the saline group on day 18 (P=0.0343). At the end of the study period, there were significant differences between the saline and the micafungin groups (P<0.0001), the saline and the fluconazole groups (P=0.0072), and the fluconazole and the micafungin groups (P=0.0013). Histopathologically, similar results were obtained. Subconjunctival injection of 0.1% micafungin was well tolerated and no adverse effects were observed. Conclusions: Subconjunctival administration of micafungin was effective in the treatment of experimental Candida keratitis. Topical application of micafungin would be a feasible treatment option for clinical fungal keratitis.

Keywords: antibiotics/antifungals/antiparasitics • fungal disease • keratitis 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×