May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Outcomes of Immunomodulatory Therapy With Mycophenolate Mofetil in Patients With Severe Ocular Inflammation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J.A. Capriotti
    Ophthalmology, New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
  • K. Narayana
    Ophthalmology, New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
  • S. Walsman
    Robert Wood Johnson Medical Scool, Newark, NJ
  • P. Latkany
    Ophthalmology, New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
  • S. Schwartzman
    Hospital For Special Surgery, New York, NY
  • C. Samson
    Ophthalmology, New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
    Ophthalmology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J.A. Capriotti, None; K. Narayana, None; S. Walsman, None; P. Latkany, None; S. Schwartzman, None; C. Samson, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 2843. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J.A. Capriotti, K. Narayana, S. Walsman, P. Latkany, S. Schwartzman, C. Samson; Outcomes of Immunomodulatory Therapy With Mycophenolate Mofetil in Patients With Severe Ocular Inflammation . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):2843.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose:To assess the efficacy and safety of the Immunomodulatory agent mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; CellCept, Roche) in a large number of patients with severe ocular inflammation. Methods: The study was an open–label, interventional, non–comparative retrospective series of 41 patients with refractory uveitis and or scleritis, with an average follow–up of 26.8 months, treated with MMF for an average period of 13.3 months ( range 3–59 months). After IRB approval, data including the intraocular inflammatory response, side–effects, and toxicity were examined. Primary outcome measures were control of intraocular inflammation and tolerability of MMF. Results:Refractory disease with or without another factor was the major indication for starting MMF, followed by steroid–sparing effect, toxicity of previous agents. MMF was effective in controlling intraocular inflammation either alone or in combination with another agent in 25 patients (60.9%) and ineffective in 9 (22.0%) . MMF had to be stopped in 7 patients due to intolerance. However, none of these patients developed any permanent systemic morbidity on follow–up. Of 74 seeing eyes, vision was maintained or improved in 60 (81.1%) patients. Conclusions: MMF is a useful alternative immunosuppressive agent for patients with recalcitrant ocular inflammation. Side effects are generally well tolerated or avoidable.

Keywords: inflammation • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: treatment/prevention assessment/controlled • immunomodulation/immunoregulation 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×